Calcutta HC: Award May Be Set Aside if Tribunal Rewrites Contract or Ignores Key Clauses  ||  Delhi HC Suspends Kuldeep Singh Sengar’s Life Term, Holding Section 5(C) of POCSO Not Made Out  ||  Calcutta High Court: Arbitration Clause in an Expired Lease Cannot be Invoked For a Fresh Lease  ||  Delhi High Court: 120-Day Timeline under Section 132B Of Income Tax Act is Not Mandatory  ||  NCLAT Reaffirms That Borrower's Debt Acknowledgment Also Extends Limitation Period for Guarantors  ||  NCLAT: Oppression & Mismanagement Petition Cannot Be Filed Without Company Membership on Filing Date  ||  Supreme Court Quashes Rajasthan Village Renaming, Says Government Must Follow its Own Policy  ||  NCLAT: NCLT Can Order Forensic Audit on its Own, No Separate Application Required  ||  NCLAT Reiterates That IBC Cannot be Invoked as a Recovery Tool for Contractual Disputes  ||  Delhi HC: DRI or Central Revenues Control Lab Presence in Delhi Alone Does Not Confer Jurisdiction    

Delhi Court: Special Judge An Upright Officer But Circumstances Raise Apprehension of Probable Bias - (26 Sep 2022)

CRIMINAL

Delhi Court while transferring proceedings in money laundering case against Satyendar Jain, has observed that although the special judge is an upright officer, the overall ‘circumstances’ are sufficient to raise a reasonable apprehension of probable bias in the mind of the Enforcement Directorate.

Tags : DELHI HIGH COURT   MONEY LAUNDERING   SATYENDAR JAIN  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved