Supreme Court: Foreign Companies’ Head Office Expenses in India are Capped under Section 44C  ||  SC Directs Trial Courts to Systematically Catalogue Witnesses and Evidence in Criminal Judgments  ||  SC Calls For Sensitising Future Generations on Equality in Marriage to Combat Dowry Practices  ||  SC: Separate Suits Against Confirmed Auction Sales are Barred; Remedy Available under Sec 47  ||  NCLT Mumbai: Oppression Claims Against Majority Shareholders Do not Justify Winding up a Company  ||  J&K&L HC Rules it Illegal and Inequitable to Deny Regularisation to a Daily Wager After 34 Years  ||  J&K&L High Court: Revisional Powers Must Be Used Within Reasonable Time; Merits Don’t Justify Delay  ||  Supreme Court: Compassionate Appointees Cannot Later Claim Entitlement to a Higher Post  ||  NCLAT New Delhi: Insolvency Pleas Cannot Be Admitted When Information Utility Records Show a Dispute  ||  NCLAT: Issuing Cheques For Another Entity’s Liabilities Does not Constitute Operational Debt    

Delhi Court: Special Judge An Upright Officer But Circumstances Raise Apprehension of Probable Bias - (26 Sep 2022)

CRIMINAL

Delhi Court while transferring proceedings in money laundering case against Satyendar Jain, has observed that although the special judge is an upright officer, the overall ‘circumstances’ are sufficient to raise a reasonable apprehension of probable bias in the mind of the Enforcement Directorate.

Tags : DELHI HIGH COURT   MONEY LAUNDERING   SATYENDAR JAIN  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved