Kerala HC: Applications under the Muslim Women’s Divorce Act Have a 3-Year Limitation Period  ||  Supreme Court: Property Transferred Before Filing a Suit Cannot be Attached under Order 38 Rule 5  ||  Supreme Court: No Review or Appeal is Maintainable Against an Order Appointing an Arbitrator  ||  SC: Terminated Contract is Not a Corporate Debtor’s Asset and a Moratorium Cannot Revive it  ||  SC: Cheque Dishonour Complaints Must be Filed at the Payee’s Home Branch under S.142(2)(A)  ||  Supreme Court: Bail Cannot be Granted Solely on Parity; Accused’s Specific Role Must be Assessed  ||  Kerala HC Upholds Life Terms For Five, Acquits Two in Renjith Johnson Murder, Says TIP Not Needed  ||  Kerala HC Orders Emergency Electric Fencing at Tribal School to Address Rising Wildlife Conflict  ||  Madras HC: Arbitrator Can’t Pierce Corporate Veil to Bind Non-Signatory and Partly Sets Aside Award  ||  Calcutta HC: Post-Award Claim For Municipal Tax Reimbursement is Not Maintainable under Section 9    

Delhi Court: Special Judge An Upright Officer But Circumstances Raise Apprehension of Probable Bias - (26 Sep 2022)

CRIMINAL

Delhi Court while transferring proceedings in money laundering case against Satyendar Jain, has observed that although the special judge is an upright officer, the overall ‘circumstances’ are sufficient to raise a reasonable apprehension of probable bias in the mind of the Enforcement Directorate.

Tags : DELHI HIGH COURT   MONEY LAUNDERING   SATYENDAR JAIN  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved