Supreme Court: Issues of Party Capacity and Maintainability Must Be Decided by Arbitral Tribunal  ||  Supreme Court: Omissions in Chief Examination Can Be Rectified During Cross-Examination  ||  Supreme Court: Items Given by Accused to Police Are Not Section 27 Recoveries under Evidence Act  ||  Gujarat High Court: Waqf Institutions Must Pay Court Fees When Filing Disputes in State Tribunal  ||  Allahabad High Court: Law Treats All Equally, State Cannot Gain Undue Benefit from Delay Condonation  ||  SC: SARFAESI Act Was Not Applicable in Nagaland Before its 2021 Adoption, Dismisses Creditor’s Plea  ||  SC: Lis Pendens Applies To Money Suits on Mortgaged Property, Including Ex Parte Proceedings  ||  Kerala HC: Civil Courts Cannot Grant Injunctions in NCLT Matters and Such Orders Can Be Set Aside  ||  Bombay High Court: Technical Breaks to Temporary Employees Cannot Deny Maternity Leave Benefits  ||  NCLAT: Appellate Jurisdiction Limited to Orders Deciding Parties’ Rights, Not Procedural Directions    

Delhi Court: Special Judge An Upright Officer But Circumstances Raise Apprehension of Probable Bias - (26 Sep 2022)

CRIMINAL

Delhi Court while transferring proceedings in money laundering case against Satyendar Jain, has observed that although the special judge is an upright officer, the overall ‘circumstances’ are sufficient to raise a reasonable apprehension of probable bias in the mind of the Enforcement Directorate.

Tags : DELHI HIGH COURT   MONEY LAUNDERING   SATYENDAR JAIN  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved