SC: Electricity Dues over 2 Years Recoverable only if Shown Continuously as Outstanding  ||  Allahabad HC Criticises UP Govt for Using Goondas Act as a ‘Tool of Oppression’  ||  Gujarat HC: Complaint Made in Good Faith does not Amount to Defamation  ||  Allahabad HC: Bar Association Membership Disputes Are Private, Outside Writ Jurisdiction  ||  P&H HC: Section 147A Income Tax Act Unconstitutional; Legislature Can’t Override Court Findings  ||  Karnataka HC: Refusing to Return Child’s Volleyball, Asking for Parent Not Abetment of Suicide  ||  Can an IBC Resolution Plan Survive the Death of its Proponent? NCLAT Answers  ||  Supreme Court: Rape Conviction Possible Without S.376 Charge if POCSO Case Fails on Age Proof  ||  SC: Mere Long Possession Can't Establish Adverse Possession; Hostile Intent is Required  ||  Supreme Court Finds Gaps in FSSAI’s Proposed Warning Labels for Foods High in Fat, Sugar and Salt    

Kar. HC: Magistrate/Judge Should Recommend in Judgment Whether there is Need for Victim Compensation - (26 Sep 2022)

CRIMINAL

Karnataka High Court has observed that while delivering final judgments, Magistrate and Sessions Judge must pass a reasoned order as to whether there is a need to make a recommendation for payment of compensation for the rehabilitation of the victim of a crime or not, under Section 357A of CrPC.

Tags : KARNATAKA HIGH COURT   VICTIM COMPENSATION   CRPC  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved