NCLAT: Can’t Dismiss Restoration App. if Filed in 30 Days from Date of Dismissal of Original App.  ||  Delhi HC: Communication between Parties through Whatsapp Constitute Valid Agreement  ||  Delhi HC Seeks Response from Govt. Over Penalties on Petrol Pumps Supplying Fuel to Old Vehicles  ||  Centre Notifies "Unified Waqf Management, Empowerment, Efficiency and Development Rules, 2025"  ||  Del. HC: Can’t Reject TM Owner’s Claim Merely because Defendant Could have Sought Removal of Mark  ||  Bombay HC: Cannot Treat Sole Director of OPC, Parallelly with Separate Legal Entity  ||  Delhi HC: Can Apply 'Family of Marks' Concept to Injunct Specific Marks  ||  HP HC: Can’t Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree for Mere Irregularity  ||  Cal. HC: Order by HC Bench Not Conferred With Determination by Roster is Void  ||  Calcutta HC: Purchase Order Including Arbitration Agreement to Prevail Over Tax Invoice Lacking it    

SC: Mere Possession of Sensitive Information Not Enough for Insider Trading, Profit Motive Essential - (22 Sep 2022)

CAPITAL MARKET

Supreme Court has held that merely because a person was in possession of unpublished price sensitive information at the time of trading in securities, it can’t be held that transaction becomes mischief of "insider trading", unless there was an intention to take advantage of the information.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   INSIDER TRADING   SECURITIES  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved