SC: Under Order XXI Rule 102 CPC, A Transferee Pendente Lite Cannot Obstruct Execution of a Decree  ||  SC: RTE Act promotes fraternity and equality by children of judges and vendors studying together  ||  MP High Court: Aadhaar and Voter ID Cards are Not Definitive Proof of Date of Birth  ||  Chhattisgarh HC: Second Marriage During Subsisting First Marriage Void Unless Custom Permits It  ||  Allahabad HC: Will in Favor of Someone Does Not Affect Compassionate Appointment Based on Dependency  ||  MP High Court: Mere Illness of a Family Member, If Improving, is Not Sufficient for Interim Bail  ||  Bombay HC: ?25K Fine for Flying Kites With Nylon Manjha; Parents Must Ensure Responsible Conduct  ||  Delhi High Court: Home State Must be the First Preference For Claiming Insider IFS Cadre Allocation  ||  SC: Hindu Daughter-In-Law Widowed After Her Father-In-Law’s Death is Entitled to Maintenance  ||  SC: Vendor Remains a Necessary Party in Specific Performance Suits Even After Transferring Property    

SC: Mere Possession of Sensitive Information Not Enough for Insider Trading, Profit Motive Essential - (22 Sep 2022)

CAPITAL MARKET

Supreme Court has held that merely because a person was in possession of unpublished price sensitive information at the time of trading in securities, it can’t be held that transaction becomes mischief of "insider trading", unless there was an intention to take advantage of the information.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   INSIDER TRADING   SECURITIES  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved