NCLAT: Resolution Professional Can’t Admit Claims Based On Uninvoked Guarantee  ||  NCLAT: Upon Approval of Resolution Plan, Claims not Included in RP Stand Extinguished  ||  All. HC: Police Must Ensure that Movement of Lawyers to Court is Unhindered  ||  Mad. HC: Can’t Bar Court from Entertaining more than One Application u/s 29A of A&C Act  ||  Kar. HC: Can Quash Cr. Proceedings on Basis of Witness Statements only in Rare Cases  ||  Kar. HC: Can’t Transfer Probe to CBI Merely because Accused is Sitting CM  ||  Bom. HC Issues Contempt Notice against Woman Circulating Objectionable Comments against SC & HC  ||  Del. HC Upholds Validity of Section 132 of the Companies Act, 2013  ||  Mad. HC: Provision Preventing Arrest of Women is Directory not Mandatory  ||  Del. HC: Bald Allegations against IO Insufficient for Transferring Probe to Another Agency    

Ker. HC: State Obliged to Protect Citizens from Ferocious Dogs, But People Can't Harm Dogs - (15 Sep 2022)

CIVIL

Kerala High Court has held that the State Administration is obligated to protect the citizens from the attacks of ferocious dogs by identifying and containing such dogs and removing them from public places, but people can't take law into hands to harm dogs.

Tags : KERALA HIGH COURT   DOGS   CITIZENS  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved