Allahabad HC: Person Reposing Faith in Islam Cannot Claim Right in Nature of Live-in-Relationship  ||  Bom. HC: Renaming of Aurangabad and Osmanabad to Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar And Dharashiv Upheld  ||  SC: Time Limit u/s 14(3) of JJ Act to Ascertain Physical & Mental Health of Juvenile is Directory  ||  SC: History Sheets Shouldn’t Contain Name of Innocent Indiv. Solely Because of their Caste or Backg.  ||  Centre to Withdraw Letter Asking States to Not Take Action Against Ayurvedic & Ayush Products Ads  ||  Centre to Withdraw Letter Asking States to Not Take Action Against Ayurvedic & Ayush Products Ads  ||  Directions Against Misleading Advertisements Issued by Supreme Court  ||  Del. HC: Rs. 1 Lakh Cost Imposed on Person Who Made Lord Hanuman Party in Property Dispute  ||  Ker. HC: Termination of 27 Weeks Pregnancy Citing Foetal Abnormalities Permitted  ||  SC: Inclined to Hold That Accused in One Case Shouldn’t be Denied Anticipatory Bail in Another Case    

Kar. HC: CDR Showing Absence of Accused at Time of Offence Can’t Lead to Closure of Proceedings - (26 Aug 2022)

CRIMINAL

Karnataka High Court has held that mere production of call record details (CDR) by the accused to show that he was not present at the time of occurrence of alleged incident, would not lead to closure of criminal proceedings by exercising powers under Section 482 of CrPC.

Tags : KARNATAKA HIGH COURT   CALL RECORD DETAILS  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved