Rajasthan High Court: No Law for Conducting Arrest through Video Calls  ||  Gauhati HC Stays Operation of Two Amendments to the Nagaland Lokayukta Act  ||  Mad. HC: “Sexual Harassment” as Seen from PoSH Act Gives Significance to the Act than the Intention  ||  Del. HC: Restriction u/s 37 of NDPS Act Cannot take Precedence Over Accused’s Right u/a 21  ||  Ker. HC: Creating Geographical Restriction for an Escort Visit Can’t be Considered Violation of FRs  ||  Bom. HC: Can Proceed with Trial if Accused Neither Appears Nor Seeks Exemption from Attendance  ||  Bom. HC: Cannot Breach Fundamental Rights of Residents Merely because they Feed Dogs  ||  Del. HC: While Calculating Compensation, Family Pension Paid to Deceased’s Family Cannot be Deducted  ||  Del. HC: Department Can't Hold Compliance once Court Orders Release of Bank Guarantee by Trader  ||  Allahabad HC: Cannot Claim Use of Loudspeakers as a Matter of Right    

SC: Proceedings Should be Initiated Within Reasonable Period When No Period is Specified in Statute - (25 Aug 2022)

CIVIL

Supreme Court while quashing notices issues in 2002 against banks to explain transactions of year 1992-1993, has held that the authorities are required to initiate proceeding within a reasonable period when no such period has been provided in the statute.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   REASONABLE PERIOD   STATUTE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved