Mad. HC: Can Attach Properties Purchased Prior to Offence if Criminal Activity Held Outside Country  ||  Ker. HC: The Term ‘Dumb’ Now Considered as Ethically and Technically Inaccurate  ||  SC: If Construction of Building Essential for Carrying Supplying Services, it Can be Held as a Plant  ||  SC Sets Aside Judgements Holding that TOLA Won’t Extend Time for Issuing Notices for Re-Assessment  ||  Supreme Court Strikes Down Khalsa University (Repeal) Act, 2017  ||  SC: Criminal Cases Having Civil Character Should be Quashed When Parties Resolved Disputes  ||  SC: Tendency to Treat Members of Denotified Tribes as Habitual to Crime Reinforces a Stereotype  ||  Raj. HC: Protecting Children's Right is Not Just a Legal Obligation, It's a Moral Imperative  ||  Cal. HC: 90 Day Timeline for Completion of Arbitral Proceedings Under MSME Act is Directory  ||  All. HC: Application u/s 34 Can’t be Dismissed for Non-Filing of Certified Copy if Explanation Given    

Cal. HC: Conduct of the Parties Can't Substitute Arbitration Agreement - (22 Aug 2022)

ARBITRATION

Calcutta High Court has held that Court while exercising powers under Section 11 of Arbitration & Conciliation Act is bound to examine existence of arbitration agreement; in absence of agreement it cannot refer parties to arbitration merely because the respondent did not raise objections.

Tags : CALCUTTA HIGH COURT   ARBITRATION AGREEMENT   OBJECTIONS  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved