SC: Consumers Cannot Bear Power Plant Depreciation Costs When No Electricity Was Supplied  ||  Supreme Court: Para-Teachers’ Regularisation Depends On Educational Standards Set By States  ||  Bombay High Court: State Cannot Withhold Aid to Child Homes While Supporting Ladki Bahin Yojana  ||  Delhi High Court: Husband Cannot Seek to Strike off Wife’s Defence over Unpaid Litigation Costs  ||  Calcutta HC: Bank Accounts Cannot Be Frozen Solely on Complaints Filed Via MHA Cybercrime Portal  ||  J&K&L HC: Unregistered Agreement to Sell Can be Considered For Assessing Possession at Interim Stage  ||  Raj HC: Cybercrime Cases Can't be Quashed Only on Compromise as They Impact Society at Large  ||  Gujarat High Court: Separate Compensation is Payable For Stillborn Child in Railway Accident Case  ||  Delhi HC: Hymen Rupture is Not Required to Prove Penetrative Sexual Assault under the POCSO Act  ||  Delhi HC: Organised Crime Groups Exploit Juveniles, Misuse Juvenile Justice Laws for Serious Crimes    

Jhar. HC: Standard of Proof to Rebut Presumption Under NI Act is of Preponderance of Probabilities - (16 Aug 2022)

BANKING

Jharkhand High Court has held that when an accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments (NI) Act has to rebut the presumption in favour of cheque holder under Section 139 of the Act, the standard of proof for doing so is that of preponderance of probabilities.

Tags : JHARKHAND HIGH COURT   NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT   PREPONDERANCE OF PROBABILITIES  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved