Calcutta HC: Demolition Orders Cannot be Challenged under Article 226 if a Statutory Appeal Exists  ||  Kerala High Court: Disability Pension is Payable to Voluntary Dischargee For Service-Related Illness  ||  Calcutta High Court: Partition Decree is Executable Only After Stamp Duty Payment  ||  Calcutta HC: Contempt Court Cannot Grant New Relief Beyond Original Order Once Compliance is Met  ||  Kerala High Court: Intentional Judicial Decisions Cannot be Altered as Clerical Errors under CPC  ||  Supreme Court: Delay In Filing Appeals under Section 74 of 2013 Land Acquisition Act is Condonable  ||  SC: Statutory Authorities may Intervene When Housing Societies Delay Membership Decisions  ||  SC: Quasi-Judicial Authorities Cannot Exercise Review Powers Unless Expressly Granted By Statute  ||  SC: Special Court Cannot Order Confiscation While Appeal Against Attachment Confirmation is Pending  ||  SC: Photocopies are Not Evidence Unless Conditions for Leading Secondary Evidence are Proved    

SC: All Adverse Evidences Should Be Put As Questions While Examining Accused U/S 313 CrPC - (05 Aug 2022)

CRIMINAL

Supreme Court has held that while examining an accused under Section 313 Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), all the adverse evidences has to put in the form of questions so as to give an opportunity to the accused to articulate his defence and give his explanation.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   CRPC   ADVERSE EVIDENCE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved