SC: Centre Agrees to Bring into Force Scheme for Golden Hour Within 1 Week  ||  SC: Can Allow Examination of Additional Witness as Prosecution Witness  ||  SC Refuses to Entertain Plea Seeking Guidelines to Regulate ‘Ticket Scalping’  ||  SC: Can’t Fully Disregard Evidence of Hostile Witness Cross-Examined by Prosecution  ||  Raj HC: For Abetment to Suicide Direct Link between Action of Accused & Victim’s Decision Must Exist  ||  Rajasthan HC: State Must Evolve Mechanism to Monitor Functioning of Municipal Bodies  ||  Delhi High Court: Due to Acute Shortage of Judges there is Inability to Decide Regular Matters  ||  Delhi High Court: Rampant Corruption in CBI, ED Shakes Entire Edifice of Machinery  ||  P&H HC: Haryana Government to Expedite Process of Fast Track Court under POCSO Act  ||  Delhi HC Refuses to Grant Injunction in Favour of San Nutrition Private Limited    

SC: Mere Use of Words ‘Arbitration’ or ‘Arbitrator’ in Clause Won't Make it Arbitration Agreement - (04 Aug 2022)

ARBITRATION

Supreme Court has held that mere use of the word "arbitration" or "arbitrator" in a clause will not make it an arbitration agreement, if it requires or contemplates a further or fresh consent of the parties for reference to arbitration.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   ARBITRATION   CLAUSE   CONSENT OF PARTIES  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved