Orissa HC: Directors Liable under S.138 NI Act Despite Company’s Insolvency  ||  Bombay HC: GST Return Details of Company Exempt from Disclosure under RTI Act  ||  Chhattisgarh HC: Timely Appointment of Electronic Evidence Examiners Vital in Cyber Crime Probes  ||  Bombay HC: GST Return Details of Company Exempt from Disclosure under RTI Act  ||  Bombay HC: GST Return Details of Company Exempt from Disclosure under RTI Act  ||  Bombay HC: Appeal under Section 37 A&C Doesn’t Bar Fresh Arbitration Proceedings  ||  Supreme Court: Upload Nodal Officer Details on Vatsalya Portal for Missing Child Cases  ||  NCLAT: ED Cannot Keep Attached Assets After Resolution Plan Approval  ||  SC: Gender-Neutral JAG Appointments Judgment Not Retrospective  ||  Supreme Court Rejects Telangana Govt Plea on HC Stay of 42% Backward Classes Reservation    

SC: Mere Use of Words ‘Arbitration’ or ‘Arbitrator’ in Clause Won't Make it Arbitration Agreement - (04 Aug 2022)

ARBITRATION

Supreme Court has held that mere use of the word "arbitration" or "arbitrator" in a clause will not make it an arbitration agreement, if it requires or contemplates a further or fresh consent of the parties for reference to arbitration.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   ARBITRATION   CLAUSE   CONSENT OF PARTIES  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved