Bombay HC Conducts Emergency Hearing from CJ’s Residence as Court Staff Deployed for Elections  ||  Madras HC: Preventive Detention Laws are Draconian, Cannot be Used to Curb Dissent or Settle Politics  ||  HP HC: Mere Interest in a Project Cannot Justify Impleading a Non-Signatory in Arbitration  ||  J&K&L HC: Women Accused in Non-Bailable Offences Form a Distinct Class Beyond Sec 437 CrPC Rigour  ||  Bombay HC Restores IMAX’s Enforcement of Foreign Awards Against E-City, Applying Res Judicata  ||  Supreme Court Upholds Cancellation of Bail For Man Accused of Assault Causing Miscarriage  ||  J&K&L High Court Invalidates Residence-Based Reservation, Citing Violation of Article 16  ||  Kerala HC Denies Parole to Life Convict in TP Chandrasekharan Murder Case For Cousin's Funeral  ||  High Court Grants Bail to J&K Bank Manager in Multi-Crore Loan Fraud Case, Emphasizing Bail As Rule  ||  J&K HC: Civil Remedy Alone Cannot Be Used To Quash Criminal Proceedings in Enso Tower Case    

Cal. HC: Intention of Parties to be Deciphered to Decide if Parties Must be Referred to Arbitration - (02 Aug 2022)

ARBITRATION

Calcutta High Court has held that where arbitration clause between parties provided that "every effort" should be made by them to settle dispute by arbitration, the term "every effort" expands scope and ambit of arbitration clause, and clearly conveyed intention to refer the disputes to arbitration.

Tags : CALCUTTA HIGH COURT   EVERY EFFORT   ARBITRATION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved