Supreme Court: Borrowers Retain Redemption Rights if Balance is Paid After Auction Deadline  ||  Supreme Court: Non-Confirmation of Seizure under Section 37A Impacts Adjudication Proceedings  ||  SC: Blacklisting After Contract Termination is Not Automatic and Needs Independent Review  ||  Grand Venice Fraud Case: Supreme Court Cancels Bail of Satinder Singh Bhasin  ||  SC: Senior Employee Cannot Claim Same Lesser Penalty As Subordinate; Bank Manager's Dismissal Upheld  ||  Madras HC: Governor Must Follow Cabinet's Advice on Remission Decisions, Regardless of Personal View  ||  Kerala High Court: Entrepreneurs Must Be Protected From Baseless Protests to Boost Industrial Growth  ||  J&K&L High Court: Second FIR Valid if it Reveals a Broader Conspiracy; 'Test of Sameness' is Key  ||  Supreme Court: Expecting a Minor to Respond to a Public Court Notice is ‘Perverse’  ||  SC: Order 23 Rule 1 CPC Applies to S. 11 Arbitration Act, Barring Fresh Arbiration After Abandonment    

Cal. HC: Intention of Parties to be Deciphered to Decide if Parties Must be Referred to Arbitration - (02 Aug 2022)

ARBITRATION

Calcutta High Court has held that where arbitration clause between parties provided that "every effort" should be made by them to settle dispute by arbitration, the term "every effort" expands scope and ambit of arbitration clause, and clearly conveyed intention to refer the disputes to arbitration.

Tags : CALCUTTA HIGH COURT   EVERY EFFORT   ARBITRATION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved