NCLAT: Can’t Use Section 94 of IBC to Hinder Recovery Process under SARFAESI Act  ||  J&K HC: Without Gazette Notification PF Coverage is 'Non Est' in Law  ||  Delhi HC: Music Based on Hindustandi Classical Music Can be Original Compositions  ||  Calcutta HC: Groping Breast of Victims Can’t be Called Attempted Rape  ||  Jharkhand HC: While Remanding Back Matter, Appellate Court Must Set Aside Impugned Order  ||  Delhi HC Sets Aside Detention of Person’s Gold Kada by Department  ||  J&K HC: S. 34 POCSO Act Vests Jurisdi. in Special Court to Determine Age of Both Offender & Victim  ||  J&K HC: Doctrine of ‘No Work No Pay’ Not Applicable if Employee Kept Away Due to Employer’s Act  ||  SC: Soldier Cannot be Asked to Prove that Disease Was Contracted by Him on Account of Service  ||  SC: Can’t Revive Time-Barred Service Dispute by Making a Belated Representation    

Del. HC: Rejection of S.34 Plea Under A&C Act Doesn’t Mean Court Concurs Views of Arbitral Tribunal - (18 Jul 2022)

ARBITRATION

Delhi High Court has held that merely because the challenge to an arbitral award is dismissed by the Court exercising powers under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation (A&C) Act would not mean that the court has concurred with the view of the arbitral tribunal.

Tags : DELHI HIGH COURT   ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL   CONCUR  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved