Madras High Court: No Appeal Lies Against E-Court Status or Adjournment Orders  ||  Chhattisgarh HC: Judicial Officer Promotion Cannot be Denied on Complaint Without Disciplinary Action  ||  Delhi High Court: January 1 as Deemed Service Date For Delhi and Andaman Civil and Police Officers  ||  Delhi High Court: Private Media Houses Performing Public Functions are Subject to Writ Jurisdiction  ||  Rajasthan High Court Orders Registration of Pets That May Pose a Threat to Human Life  ||  Delhi High Court: NSE Qualifies as a Public Authority under the RTI Act  ||  Bombay High Court: Sikh Exemption From Helmet Rule is a Reasonable Classification under Article 14  ||  Supreme Court: Advocate Cannot Enter a Compromise Without the Client’s Authorisation  ||  Calcutta High Court: State Must Protect Every Accused From Mob Violence  ||  Supreme Court: Gujarat Municipal Election Candidates Must Disclose Their Spouses’ Assets    

CESTAT: Providing Trained Manpower to Overseas Customers is Not an Intermediary - (11 Jul 2022)

SERVICE TAX

Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Mumbai Bench has held that providing trained manpower to overseas customers is not an intermediary and allowed refund claims under the provision of CENVAT Credit.

Tags : CESTAT   CENVAT CREDIT   OVERSEAS CUSTOMERS  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved