Delhi High Court: Assets From Illegal Cricket Betting are Proceeds of Crime Attachable by ED  ||  Delhi HC: Extension to Issue SCN U/S 110 of The Customs Act Must be Granted Before Six Months Expire  ||  Delhi HC: Statements to Customs under Section 108 During Goods Seizure Aren't Admissible As Evidence  ||  Delhi HC: Oral Waiver of a Show-Cause Notice is Invalid And Continued Detention of Goods is Unlawful  ||  Supreme Court: Letter of Intent is a 'Promise in Embryo', Rights Arise Only After Conditions Met  ||  SC Auction Sale under Order XXI Rule 90 CPC Cannot Be Challenged on Pre-Proclamation Grounds  ||  NCLT Kochi: CoC May Invite Fresh Bids, Regulations Only Restrict Alteration of Existing Bids  ||  Chhattisgarh HC: Father Must Provide Maintenance and Marriage Expenses to Unmarried Adult Daughter  ||  Delhi HC Rules That ‘Hermès’ and the 3D Shape of its ‘Birkin’ Bag are Well-Known Trademarks in India  ||  Kerala HC: Arrest is Illegal if Accused isn’t Produced in 24 Hours and Rearrest From Prison is Barred    

P&H HC: Can't Approach HC U/S 438 CrPC After Rejection of Pre-Arrest Bail for Case Under SC/ST Act - (04 Jul 2022)

CRIMINAL

Punjab and Haryana High Court has held that once the plea for anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC is rejected by Sessions Court to accused under Scheduled Caste & Scheduled Tribes (SC/ST) Act, 1989, accused cannot invoked High Court's concurrent jurisdiction under Section 438 CrPC.

Tags : PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT   ANTICIPATORY BAIL   SCHEDULED CASTE & SCHEDULED TRIBES  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved