Allahabad HC: Victim Compensation under POCSO Act Cannot be Withheld For Lack of Injury Report  ||  MP HC: Diverting Goods From Delivery Point is Misappropriation under S.407 IPC  ||  Delhi HC: Bar Associations are Not ‘State’ under Article 12 as They Do Not Perform Public Functions  ||  Delhi HC: Pending Probate Proceedings Do Not Prevent Filing FIR For Alleged Will Forgery  ||  Ker HC: Dismissal For Default Alone Cannot Justify Rejecting Restoration Plea For Lack of Vigilance  ||  SC: Disclosure Statements Alone Cannot Secure Conviction Without a Complete Chain of Evidence  ||  Supreme Court Orders Reporting of Student Suicides and Bans Denial of Classes or Exams  ||  SC: Govt Can Exclude Overqualified Candidates From Posts Requiring Lower Qualifications  ||  SC: Contracts to Hire Global Speakers For Media Summits are Not Taxable as Event Management Services  ||  SC: Mandatory Injunction Suit Alone is Not Maintainable When Plaintiff’s Title is Disputed    

Madras HC: Rigidity of Section 33(5) of POCSO Act Gets Diluted Once Victim Attains Majority - (04 Jul 2022)

CRIMINAL

Madras High Court has held that Section 33 (5) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act was introduced to ensure that child is not repeatedly called to Court, however if the victim has attained majority, she can be called for cross examination.

Tags : MADRAS HIGH COURT   POCSO   CROSS EXAMINATION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved