Supreme Court: Wait-Listed Candidates Have No Vested Right After List Expiry  ||  SC: Reserved Candidates Scoring Above General Cut-Off Must be Considered For Open Posts  ||  SC: AICTE Regulations Do Not Govern Direct Recruitment of Engineering Professors by State PSCs  ||  Supreme Court: High Courts To Decide Article 226(3) Applications Within Two Weeks  ||  SC: State Agencies are Competent To Probe Corruption Cases Against Central Government Officers  ||  Allahabad High Court: Wife May Claim Education Expenses; Adverse Inference If Husband Hides Income  ||  Patna High Court: Cruelty Claims Against In-Laws are Unlikely Without Shared Residence or Interaction  ||  Patna HC: Aadhaar and GPS-Based Attendance For Medical College Faculty Does Not Violate Privacy  ||  Allahabad HC: Victim Compensation under POCSO Act Cannot be Withheld For Lack of Injury Report  ||  MP HC: Diverting Goods From Delivery Point is Misappropriation under S.407 IPC    

Allahabad HC: Shouldn't Advise Clients to Reagitate Matters if No Error Apparent on Face of Record - (27 Jun 2022)

CIVIL

Allahabad High Court has held that an advocate should not give advice of re-agitating matter when there is no error apparent on the face of the record nor was there any other reason why the matter be re-agitated after it was finally decided.

Tags : ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT   REAGITATE MATTERS   ERROR  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved