Bombay HC: Well Qualified Wife Expressing Desire to Pursue Job Not Cruelty  ||  Delhi HC: Mere Engagement Does Not Permit a Person to Sexually Assault His Fiancé  ||  Centre Appoints Delhi HC Judge Justice Dinesh Kumar Sharma as Presiding Officer of UAPA Tribunal  ||  Delhi HC Orders Shifting of Kashmiri Separatist Leader to AIIMS After Cancer Diagnosis  ||  Delhi HC: Existing Panel of Delhi Govt. Can’t Continue to Function Under Mental Healthcare Act  ||  Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Anil Deshmukh in Money Laundering Case  ||  Delhi HC: Section 17 of Senior Citizens Act No Bar for Lawyer Representing Parties Before Tribunal  ||  SC: Dependents Entitled to Compensation for Loss of Income Even if They Inherit Business of Deceased  ||  Kerala HC: Mistake by Court Staff Not Sufficient Ground to Non-Suit Party  ||  SC: Sometimes Lawyers Only Obstruct Justice by Seeking Adjournment After Coming to Court Unprepared    

Dknv Engineering Pvt Ltd vs. Commissioner of Central Excise & ST - (Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal) (13 Jun 2022)

Availment of credit on the strength of photocopies of the invoices is a procedural lapse and cannot be made the basis to disallow the credit


Service Tax

The limited issue involved in the present case is that the Revenue denied Cenvat credit availed on the strength of Xerox copies of the purchase invoices.

Learned Superintendent (AR) appearing on behalf of the Revenue reiterates the findings of the impugned order and submits that the Appellant was supposed to take Cenvat credit on the original copies of the invoices, therefore, the Department has rightly denied the credit availed on photocopies.

The credit was denied only on the basis that Appellant failed to produce original copy of invoices. However, there is no dispute as regards the purchase of goods and use thereof in the manufacture of final product. The goods are entered in the purchase accounts and therefore, purchase of goods, receipt and use thereof in the manufacture of final products is not disputed. Merely because the original copy of invoice is not available, it cannot alter the important criteria of availing the credit when it is satisfies other criteria.

It is settled that, availment of credit on the strength of photo copies of the invoices is just a procedural lapse and cannot be made the basis to disallow the credit. In the absence of any evidence that appellant had not received the goods, credit cannot be denied. Therefore, reasons for denial of credit are not sustainable. Accordingly, the impugned order is set-aside. Appeal allowed.


Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2022 - All Rights Reserved