Allahabad HC: Police Report in Non-Cognizable Offence is a Complaint; Accused Must Be Heard First  ||  Kerala HC: Hospitals Must Display Rates and Cannot Deny Emergency Care For Lack of Advance Payment  ||  Orissa HC: Convict’s Refusal to Appeal Through Legal Aid Must be Recorded in Writing  ||  SC Halts Deer Translocation From Delhi’s AN Jha Park And Orders a Probe into DDA Negligence  ||  Supreme Court: The Growing Trend of Succeeding Benches Overturning Earlier Judgments is Troubling  ||  SC: Administrative Orders Must be Based on Stated Reasons and Cannot Add New Grounds Later  ||  HP HC: Mixing Contraband Pouches Before Sampling Raises Serious Doubts About Accused's Possession  ||  Bombay HC: Drug Names Using International Non-Proprietary Names Cannot be Monopolized  ||  Delhi High Court: Assets From Illegal Cricket Betting are Proceeds of Crime Attachable by ED  ||  Delhi HC: Extension to Issue SCN U/S 110 of The Customs Act Must be Granted Before Six Months Expire    

CESTAT: Order for Confiscation of Goods Cannot be Made through Corrigendum to Original Order - (25 May 2022)

CUSTOMS

Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chennai bench has held that the corrigendum to original order can only correct typo errors and the same cannot be issued to confiscate goods.

Tags : CESTAT   CONFISCATION   ORIGINAL ORDER  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved