Del. HC: Liquidated Damages Mentioned in Agreement Can’t be Awarded in Absence of Proof of Loss  ||  MP HC: S.375 Marital Sex Exemption Also Provides Exemption Under Section 377 of IPC  ||  SC: SARFAESI Doesn’t Give Any License to Bank Officers to Act Against the Scheme of Law  ||  All. HC: Court Can’t Mechanically Reject Application for Waiving Off Cooling Period u/s 13B of HMA  ||  Kar. HC: Acquittal Order Can’t be Put in Challenge by Stranger to the Case  ||  Kar. HC: Alternate Remedy Can’t be Used as China Wall Against Invocation of Writ Jurisdiction  ||  Bom. HC Upholds Constitutional Validity of Goa’s Green Cess Act  ||  Del. HC: Not Court’s Business to Demonstrate Morality of an Act unless it has Caused Harm  ||  Del. HC: Cost Accountants and Chartered Accountants Not Similarly Placed Under Law  ||  SC: No Party Ought to be Vexed Twice in a Litigation for One and the Same Cause    

NCLAT Upholds Dismissal of Petition Filed During Prohibited Period - (24 May 2022)

INSOLVENCY

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal while adjudicating an appeal has upheld that Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process cannot be initiated over a default which had occurred in the period mentioned under S.10A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, i.e. between 25.03.2020 to March, 2021.

Tags : NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL   CORPORATE INSOLVENCY RESOLUTION PROCESS   INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2023 - All Rights Reserved