Madras HC: Police Superintendent not Liable For IO’s Delay In Filing Chargesheet or Closure Report  ||  Supreme Court: Provident Fund Dues Have Priority over a Bank’s Claim under the SARFAESI Act  ||  SC Holds Landowners Who Accept Compensation Settlements Cannot Later Seek Statutory Benefits  ||  Supreme Court: Endless Investigations and Long Delays in Chargesheets Can Justify Quashing  ||  Delhi HC: Arbitrator Controls Evidence and Appellate Courts Cannot Reassess Facts  ||  Delhi HC: ED Can Search Anyone Holding Crime Proceeds, not Just Those Named in Complaint  ||  Delhi HC: ED Can Search Anyone Holding Crime Proceeds, not Just Those Named in Complaint  ||  Delhi HC: Economic Offender Cannot Seek Travel Abroad For Medical Treatment When Available In India  ||  SC: Governors and President Have No Fixed Timeline To Assent To Bills; “Deemed Assent” is Invalid  ||  SC: Assigning a Decree For Specific Performance of a Sale Agreement Does Not Require Registration    

Meghalaya HC: Dishonored Cheque Must Have Been Issued by Account Holder U/S.138 NI Act - (18 May 2022)

BANKING

Meghalaya High Court has reiterated that the dishonoured cheque must have been issued by the account holder under his name and signature for an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 to be made out.

Tags : MEGHALAYA HIGH COURT   DISHONOURED CHEQUE   SECTION 138   NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT   1881  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved