Supreme Court: Drug Users are Victims and Focus Must Be on Breaking the Supply Chain  ||  Supreme Court: Non-Signatories May Join Arbitration When the Dispute Affects Their Rights  ||  Delhi HC: Homemaker’s Services Cannot Be Ignored in Compensation Due to Age  ||  Kerala High Court Directs Photos and Videos of Illegal Vehicle Modifications in Accident Reports  ||  Madras HC: Property Acquired by Catholic Priests Belongs to the Religious Society  ||  Delhi HC: Pre-Marital Disability Cannot Be Used to Avoid Maintenance to Wife and Child  ||  Allahabad HC: Religious Freedom Does Not Confer a Right to a Specific Plot for Cemetery  ||  Allahabad HC: Dissatisfaction With Police Probe Alone Cannot Prove Wilful Neglect under SC/ST Act  ||  Kerala HC: Teachers Cannot Face Criminal Action for Trivial Classroom Discipline Measures  ||  Supreme Court: Past Ad Hoc Service Counts for Pension, Not Seniority Against Direct Recruits    

Meghalaya HC: Dishonored Cheque Must Have Been Issued by Account Holder U/S.138 NI Act - (18 May 2022)

BANKING

Meghalaya High Court has reiterated that the dishonoured cheque must have been issued by the account holder under his name and signature for an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 to be made out.

Tags : MEGHALAYA HIGH COURT   DISHONOURED CHEQUE   SECTION 138   NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT   1881  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved