NCLT: Suspended Directors Who are Prospective Resolution Applicants Cann’t Access Valuation Reports  ||  Supreme Court Clarifies Test For Granting Bail to Accused Added at Trial under Section 319 CrPC  ||  SC: Fresh Notification For Vijayawada ACB Police Station not Required After AP Bifurcation  ||  SC: Studying in a Government Institute Does Not Create an Automatic Right to a Government Job  ||  NCLT Mumbai: CIRP Claims Cannot Invoke the 12-Year Limitation Period For Enforcing Mortgage Rights  ||  NCLAT: Misnaming Guarantor as 'Director' in SARFAESI Notice Doesn't Void Guarantee Invocation  ||  Jharkhand HC: Mere Breach of Compromise Terms by an Accused Does Not Justify Bail Cancellation  ||  Cal HC: Banks Cannot Freeze a Company's Accounts Solely Due To ROC Labeling a 'Management Dispute'  ||  Rajasthan HC: Father’s Rape of His Daughter Transcends Ordinary Crime; Victim’s Testimony Suffices  ||  Delhi HC: Judge Who Reserved Judgment Must Deliver Verdict Despite Transfer; Successor Can't Rehear    

NCLAT: Insolvency Cannot be Initiated on Basis of Unpaid LTC And Leave Encashment Dues - (16 May 2022)

COMPANY

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, has ruled that the welfare claims such as Leave Encashment, superannuation dues are not operational debt for the initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process of the Corporate Debtor under Section 9 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Tags : NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL   LEAVE ENCASHMENT   CORPORATE DEBTOR   SECTION 9   INSOLVENCY & BANKRUPTCY CODE   2016   SUPERANNUATION DUES  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved