All HC: Can’t Invoke Penalty Proceedings u/s 129 of UPGST Act, 2017 For Search And Seizure Of Godown  ||  All. HC: Businessman Doing Business Activities Within Slum Can’t Be Called a Slum Dweller  ||  SC: No Charity Being Done By State For Paying Compensation to Person Whose Land Was Acquired  ||  Gauhati HC: Can’t Shift Burden of Proof on Accused if Multiple Witnesses of Crime Present  ||  SC: Contempt Notice Issued Against Patanjali For Continued Publishing of Misleading Advertisements  ||  SC: Registry Can’t Decide Whether or Not Review Petiton Merits Relook Through Curative Petiton  ||  Bom. HC: Imprisonment Exceeding Twelve Months Can’t Be Given For Default in Payment of Maintenance  ||  Cal. HC: Cannot Differentiate Between Contractual and Permanent Employees For Maternity Leave  ||  Supreme Court: Entering Into Sale Agreement With Minor is Void and Unenforceable  ||  SC: Information Disclosing Cognizable Offence to Be Recorded as FIR & Not in General Diary    

NCLAT: Insolvency Cannot be Initiated on Basis of Unpaid LTC And Leave Encashment Dues - (16 May 2022)

COMPANY

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, has ruled that the welfare claims such as Leave Encashment, superannuation dues are not operational debt for the initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process of the Corporate Debtor under Section 9 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Tags : NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL   LEAVE ENCASHMENT   CORPORATE DEBTOR   SECTION 9   INSOLVENCY & BANKRUPTCY CODE   2016   SUPERANNUATION DUES  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved