SC: Suit Alleging Coercion or Undue Influence Cannot be Rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC || Cal HC: Once ED Attachment is Confirmed, Challenge Becomes Academic; PMLA Remedy Must be Pursued || MP HC: Pen-Drive Evidence Cannot be Introduced At a Late Trial Stage Without Proof or Relevance || Calcutta HC: Employee Can't be Stopped From Joining Rival Post-Resignation; Trade Secrets Protected || Calcutta HC: Banks Must Provide Forensic Audit Report Before Calling an Account Fraudulent || Del HC: Woman Cannot Demand Re-Entry to Abandoned Matrimonial Home if Alternate Accommodation Exists || Calcutta HC: Land Acquisition For Industrial Park is Public Purpose; Leasing to Industry is Valid || Patna HC: PwD Recruitment Must Comply With RPwD Act; Executive Resolutions Cannot Override the Law || Madras HC: Individuals Facing Criminal Trial Must Get Court Permission Even to Renew Passports || Calcutta HC: Demolition Orders Cannot be Challenged under Article 226 if a Statutory Appeal Exists

The Branch Manager, Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Limited v. Janga Bahadur Chettri and Ors. - (High Court of Sikkim) (12 Aug 2015)

Deceased student entitled to compensation against future prospects even if unemployed

MANU/SI/0073/2015

Motor Vehicles

The Court rejected the arguments of the Appellant that the deceased did not have future prospects as the income worked out by the MACT was notional. It determined that an assumption based on reasonable criteria would yield that the deceased, a 17 year old student, would have future prospects.

Relevant : Sarla Verma (Smt) and Others v. Delhi Transport Corporation and Another MANU/SC/0606/2009 New India Assurance Company Ltd. v. Nakul Gurung & Ors MANU/SI/0022/2009 Simar Kaur v. Pawan Kumar and Others MANU/PH/4048/2013

Tags : MOTOR FUTURE PROSPECT UNEMPLOYED COMPENSATION

Share :