Supreme Court: Award Valid Even If Passed After Mandate Expiry When Court Extends Time || Jharkhand HC: Regular Bail Plea During Interim Bail is Not Maintainable under Section 483 BNSS || Cal HC: Theft Claims and Public Humiliation Alone Don’t Amount To Abetment of Suicide U/S 306 IPC || Delhi High Court: Elective Surgery Does Not Bar Grant of Interim Bail on Medical Grounds || Delhi HC: Consensual Romance With Minor Nearing 18 May be Considered For Bail in POCSO Case || Delhi HC: Not Named In FIR Doesn’t Matter If Financial Links Show Active Role in NDPS Offence || Chhattisgarh HC: Rape is an Affront to Womanhood and a Brutal Violation of The Right To Life || Supreme Court: Single Insolvency Petition Maintainable Against Linked Corporate Entities || Supreme Court: Disputes are Not Arbitrable When the Arbitration Agreement is Alleged to be Forged || Supreme Court: Temple Trust Does Not Qualify as an ‘Industry’ under the Industrial Disputes Act

The Branch Manager, Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Limited v. Janga Bahadur Chettri and Ors. - (High Court of Sikkim) (12 Aug 2015)

Deceased student entitled to compensation against future prospects even if unemployed

MANU/SI/0073/2015

Motor Vehicles

The Court rejected the arguments of the Appellant that the deceased did not have future prospects as the income worked out by the MACT was notional. It determined that an assumption based on reasonable criteria would yield that the deceased, a 17 year old student, would have future prospects.

Relevant : Sarla Verma (Smt) and Others v. Delhi Transport Corporation and Another MANU/SC/0606/2009 New India Assurance Company Ltd. v. Nakul Gurung & Ors MANU/SI/0022/2009 Simar Kaur v. Pawan Kumar and Others MANU/PH/4048/2013

Tags : MOTOR FUTURE PROSPECT UNEMPLOYED COMPENSATION

Share :