SC: Clarificatory Statement Does Not Constitute a Binding Undertaking for Contempt Proceedings  ||  Supreme Court: Litigant Cannot be Worse Off for Filing an Appeal under ‘No Reformatio in Peius’  ||  Orissa HC: Article 22(1) Arrest Rights Pre-Exist, Written Grounds Ruling Not Prospective  ||  Kerala HC: Kissing a Child’s Penis Constitutes Penetrative Sexual Assault under POCSO  ||  Madras HC: Married Daughter Cannot be Denied Compassionate Appointment Solely for Her Marriage  ||  Bombay High Court: Child Welfare Prevails as ‘Joint Parenting’ is Not Recognised in Indian Law  ||  Kerala HC: Minor’s Consent or Relationship with Accused Holds No Relevance under POCSO Act  ||  Bombay HC: Failure to Prove Exact Quantum of Loss Does Not Bar Compensation  ||  CCPA Fines Dial4Trade Rs. 10 Lakh for Online Ammonium Nitrate Listing Featuring Blast Images  ||  Supreme Court: Multiple Cases Alone Cannot Justify an Externment Order    

Rajasthan HC: Smuggling of Gold Can't be Treated As Terrorist Act Under UAPA - (09 May 2022)

CRIMINAL

Rajasthan High Court has observed that Customs Act, 1962 is not included in Schedule-II of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 and consequently smuggling of gold and that too of a quantity which is bailable under the Customs Act cannot be treated as Terrorist Act.

Tags : RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT   CUSTOMS ACT   1962   UNLAWFUL ACTIVITIES (PREVENTION) ACT   1967   TERRORIST ACT   BAILABLE   SCHEDULE-II  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved