MP HC: Policy of First Come, First Serve is Inherently Flawed  ||  Bombay HC: Arbitration Clause Giving Unilateral Power Does Not Render the Agreement Invalid  ||  Madras HC: Taxpayer Not Responding to Notices Should be Sent Reminder through RPAD  ||  Madras HC: Taxpayer Not Responding to Notices Should be Sent Reminder through RPAD  ||  Bombay HC: There is Prohibition Only on "Talaq-e-biddat" and Not on "Talaq-e-Ahsan"  ||  Bombay HC: Government Allottee Lacking Legal Occupation Can’t be Considered ‘Deemed Tenant’  ||  AP HC: If a “Necessary Party” is Not Impleaded, the Suit Itself is Liable to be Dismissed  ||  Delhi HC: No Affect on Charitable Trust’s Status for Making Payments for Services by Related Party  ||  Bombay HC Directs State Govt. to Upload State's Prison & Police Manual on Internet  ||  Delhi HC: If Use of Smoke Cannister a Terrorist Act then Every Holi & IPL Match Will Attract UAPA    

Rajasthan HC: Respondents Have Right to Legal Representation Before Regulatory Authority/ Tribunal - (29 Apr 2022)

CIVIL

Rajasthan High Court has observed that Section 56 of the Rajasthan Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, inasmuch as it excludes right of Respondents to legal representation before the Appellate Tribunal or the Regulatory Authority or the adjudicating officer, is ultra vires.

Tags : RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT   SECTION 56 OF THE RAJASTHAN REAL ESTATE (REGULATION AND DEVELOPMENT) ACT   2016   APPELLATE TRIBUNAL   REGULATORY AUTHORITY   ADJUDICATING OFFICER   ULTRA VIRES  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved