Supreme Court: After the BNSS, a Pre-Cognizance Hearing is Mandatory in PMLA Cases  ||  SC: Landowners Cannot be Forced to Waive Statutory Compensation to Claim Other Benefits  ||  Supreme Court: Banks are Lenient With Big Borrowers But Strict With Ordinary Loan Applicants  ||  Delhi HC: Minimum Wages During Pending Litigation Cannot be Frozen and Must be Updated Periodically  ||  Kerala HC: ICC Can Probe Sexual Harassment Complaint Against a Director Not Controlling Affairs  ||  Delhi HC: Interim Protection From Blacklisting Does Not Remove Bidder’s Duty to Disclose in Tenders  ||  Allahabad HC: After the BNSS, Pre-Cognizance Hearing of the Accused is Mandatory in NDPS Complaints  ||  Delhi HC: Husband Cannot Avoid Maintenance For Wife and Children by Claiming Irregular Income  ||  SC: Repeated Anticipatory Bail Pleas Abuse Process and Reduce Litigation to a Gamble  ||  Supreme Court: State Officers Cannot Back Litigants Through Affidavits Against the Law    

Rajasthan HC: Respondents Have Right to Legal Representation Before Regulatory Authority/ Tribunal - (29 Apr 2022)

CIVIL

Rajasthan High Court has observed that Section 56 of the Rajasthan Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, inasmuch as it excludes right of Respondents to legal representation before the Appellate Tribunal or the Regulatory Authority or the adjudicating officer, is ultra vires.

Tags : RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT   SECTION 56 OF THE RAJASTHAN REAL ESTATE (REGULATION AND DEVELOPMENT) ACT   2016   APPELLATE TRIBUNAL   REGULATORY AUTHORITY   ADJUDICATING OFFICER   ULTRA VIRES  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved