J&K&L HC: Matrimonial Remedies May Overlap, But Cruelty Claims Cannot be Selectively Invoked  ||  Delhi High Court: Customs Officials Acting Officially Cannot be Cross-Examined as of Right  ||  J&K&L HC: Second Arbitral Reference is Maintainable if Award is Set Aside Without Deciding Merits  ||  J&K&L HC: Gold Voluntarily Given to Customer is 'Entrustment'; Theft Excluded from Insurance Cover  ||  Delhi HC: Working Mothers Cannot be Forced to Bear Full Childcare Burden While Fathers Evade Duty  ||  J&K&L HC: Arbitral Tribunal Not a “Court”; Giving False Evidence Before it Doesn’t Attract S.195 CrPC  ||  Calcutta HC: Award May Be Set Aside if Tribunal Rewrites Contract or Ignores Key Clauses  ||  Delhi HC Suspends Kuldeep Singh Sengar’s Life Term, Holding Section 5(C) of POCSO Not Made Out  ||  Calcutta High Court: Arbitration Clause in an Expired Lease Cannot be Invoked For a Fresh Lease  ||  Delhi High Court: 120-Day Timeline under Section 132B Of Income Tax Act is Not Mandatory    

Rajasthan HC: Respondents Have Right to Legal Representation Before Regulatory Authority/ Tribunal - (29 Apr 2022)

CIVIL

Rajasthan High Court has observed that Section 56 of the Rajasthan Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, inasmuch as it excludes right of Respondents to legal representation before the Appellate Tribunal or the Regulatory Authority or the adjudicating officer, is ultra vires.

Tags : RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT   SECTION 56 OF THE RAJASTHAN REAL ESTATE (REGULATION AND DEVELOPMENT) ACT   2016   APPELLATE TRIBUNAL   REGULATORY AUTHORITY   ADJUDICATING OFFICER   ULTRA VIRES  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved