Supreme Court Upholds Conviction as Husband Failed to Explain Wife’s Death in Matrimonial Home  ||  Supreme Court: Crime Scene Re-Enactment Does Not Always Violate Right Against Self-Incrimination  ||  Supreme Court: Cognizance Taken Without Hearing Accused under BNSS Section 223 is Void Ab Initio  ||  Supreme Court Upholds Will in Sister’s Favour, Says Excluding Natural Heirs is Not Suspicious  ||  Delhi HC: Absence of Public Witnesses and Videography in NDPS Recovery Relevant for Bail Decisions  ||  Raj HC Initiates Suo Motu Cognizance Over Severe Water Crisis in Jodhpur, Issues Interim Directions  ||  Del HC: Courts Cannot Direct, Monitor Inquiry Into Police Delay in Investigation After Bail Decision  ||  Supreme Court: After the BNSS, a Pre-Cognizance Hearing is Mandatory in PMLA Cases  ||  SC: Landowners Cannot be Forced to Waive Statutory Compensation to Claim Other Benefits  ||  Supreme Court: Banks are Lenient With Big Borrowers But Strict With Ordinary Loan Applicants    

Rajasthan HC: Respondents Have Right to Legal Representation Before Regulatory Authority/ Tribunal - (29 Apr 2022)

CIVIL

Rajasthan High Court has observed that Section 56 of the Rajasthan Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, inasmuch as it excludes right of Respondents to legal representation before the Appellate Tribunal or the Regulatory Authority or the adjudicating officer, is ultra vires.

Tags : RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT   SECTION 56 OF THE RAJASTHAN REAL ESTATE (REGULATION AND DEVELOPMENT) ACT   2016   APPELLATE TRIBUNAL   REGULATORY AUTHORITY   ADJUDICATING OFFICER   ULTRA VIRES  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved