Delhi HC: Economic Offender Cannot Seek Travel Abroad For Medical Treatment When Available In India  ||  SC: Governors and President Have No Fixed Timeline To Assent To Bills; “Deemed Assent” is Invalid  ||  SC: Assigning a Decree For Specific Performance of a Sale Agreement Does Not Require Registration  ||  SC: No Quota Applies For Judicial Officers in District Judge Posts, Issuing Seniority Guidelines  ||  SC: Interest Rate Disputes Doesn't Fall under Public Policy to Set Aside Arbitration Awards  ||  SC: If Some Offences are Quashed By Compromise, the FIR For The Same Incident Cannot Continue  ||  Supreme Court: TIP is Unreliable if the Witness Saw the Accused Beforehand  ||  Delhi HC: MYAS Not Bound to ‘Rubber-Stamp’ International Federation Choices  ||  AP HC: Fulfilling Rehabilitation Promises to Displaced is State’s Constitutional Obligation  ||  SC: Career Progression to Higher Echelons of Judiciary is Neither a Matter of Right Nor Entitlement    

ITAT, Bangalore: Assessee Couldn’t Submit Evidence for Payment of Brokerage for Sale of Property - (29 Apr 2022)

DIRECT TAXATION

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore has permitted 1% of the sale consideration as brokerage for the sale of the property since the assessee couldn’t prove the evidence for the payment of brokerage to calculate the amount of capital gain under the provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Tags : INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL   BROKERAGE   INCOME TAX ACT   1961   ASSESSEE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved