SC: Electricity Dues over 2 Years Recoverable only if Shown Continuously as Outstanding  ||  Allahabad HC Criticises UP Govt for Using Goondas Act as a ‘Tool of Oppression’  ||  Gujarat HC: Complaint Made in Good Faith does not Amount to Defamation  ||  Allahabad HC: Bar Association Membership Disputes Are Private, Outside Writ Jurisdiction  ||  P&H HC: Section 147A Income Tax Act Unconstitutional; Legislature Can’t Override Court Findings  ||  Karnataka HC: Refusing to Return Child’s Volleyball, Asking for Parent Not Abetment of Suicide  ||  Can an IBC Resolution Plan Survive the Death of its Proponent? NCLAT Answers  ||  Supreme Court: Rape Conviction Possible Without S.376 Charge if POCSO Case Fails on Age Proof  ||  SC: Mere Long Possession Can't Establish Adverse Possession; Hostile Intent is Required  ||  Supreme Court Finds Gaps in FSSAI’s Proposed Warning Labels for Foods High in Fat, Sugar and Salt    

ITAT, Bangalore: Assessee Couldn’t Submit Evidence for Payment of Brokerage for Sale of Property - (29 Apr 2022)

DIRECT TAXATION

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore has permitted 1% of the sale consideration as brokerage for the sale of the property since the assessee couldn’t prove the evidence for the payment of brokerage to calculate the amount of capital gain under the provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Tags : INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL   BROKERAGE   INCOME TAX ACT   1961   ASSESSEE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved