Bom. HC: Maharashtra Govt Criticized for Exhibiting Mindset to Curtail Liberty of Undertrials  ||  Ori. HC: Stay of Execution Proceedings Under Arbitration Act Governed by Provisions of CPC  ||  SC: Intricate Enquiry Whether Claims are Time Barred Must Not be Conducted by Referral Courts  ||  Mad. HC: Proposed Changes in Criminal Laws Could have been Brought Through Amendments  ||  Bom. HC: Govt’s Decision to Exempt Pvt. Schools From 25% RTE Quota 'Unconstitutional'  ||  Ker. HC: To Proceed Against an Offence Committed Partly in India, Sanction of Centre Not Required  ||  Del. HC: Court to Take up Matter Referred to Arbitral Tribunal if Urgency Occurs  ||  Guj. HC: Asking Unknown Woman her Name, Address Doesn’t Constitute Sexual Harassment  ||  SC: In Cases of Long Incarceration, Watali Judgement Cannot be Cited as a Precedent  ||  Kerala HC: BNSS to be Applicable in all Criminal Appeals after 1st July, 2024    

NCLAT, Delhi: Time Period Under Regulation 35A is Directory, Not Mandatory - (27 Apr 2022)

INSOLVENCY

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, has observed that period of time prescribed under Regulation 35A of the IBBI (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) (CIRP) Regulations, 2016 is directory in nature and not mandatory.

Tags : NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL   REGULATION 35A   IBBI (INSOLVENCY RESOLUTION PROCESS FOR CORPORATE PERSONS) (CIRP) REGULATIONS   2016  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved