Calling the Situation Grim, the Supreme Court Takes Suo Motu Cognizance of Delays in NCLT Approvals  ||  Supreme Court: Admission of a Claim by a Resolution Professional is Not Debt Acknowledgment  ||  Supreme Court: Public Figures Must Exercise Caution as Their Words Have Consequences in Society  ||  SC: State Must Act as a Model Employer, Criticising the Union For Not Regularising ISRO Workers  ||  J&K&L High Court: Minor Minerals Have Major Environmental Impacts and Must be Regulated  ||  Del HC: Unexplained Money Received by Public Servant is Not Bribery Without Proof of Official Favour  ||  Del HC: There is No Absolute Bar on Granting Co-Convicts Parole/Furlough Together in Suitable Cases  ||  Bom HC: LARR Authority Can Examine Limitation Issues in Land Acquisition References under 2013 Act  ||  MP HC: Long-Serving Employees Cannot Be Denied Regularisation by Retrospective Statutory Amendments  ||  J&K&L HC: Routine Challenges to Lok Adalat Awards Defeat Their Purpose of Quick Dispute Resolution    

NCLAT, Delhi: Time Period Under Regulation 35A is Directory, Not Mandatory - (27 Apr 2022)

INSOLVENCY

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, has observed that period of time prescribed under Regulation 35A of the IBBI (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) (CIRP) Regulations, 2016 is directory in nature and not mandatory.

Tags : NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL   REGULATION 35A   IBBI (INSOLVENCY RESOLUTION PROCESS FOR CORPORATE PERSONS) (CIRP) REGULATIONS   2016  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved