Allahabad HC Reduces Cop's Sentence in 1984 Attempt-to-Murder Case, Awards Rs. 35,000 to Victim  ||  Delhi High Court: Copyright Owners and ISPs Cannot Unilaterally Declare a Website 'Rogue'  ||  Rajasthan HC: Teacher's Reprimand for Poor Attendance and Performance is Not Abetment of Suicide  ||  Karnataka High Court: Police Assistance to Enforce Injunction Not Barred by Res Judicata  ||  SC Upholds Validity of Section 16(2)(c) of CGST Act, Says ITC Depends on Supplier's Tax Payment  ||  Supreme Court: Registration Certificate Alone Can't Secure Interim Release of Seized Vehicles  ||  Supreme Court: IBC Moratorium Doesn't Shield Promoters, Directors From Consumer Complaints  ||  Supreme Court: Accused Person's Advocate Cannot Remain Present During Entire Police Interrogation  ||  Uttarakhand HC: Severity of POCSO Charges Alone Cannot Deny Juvenile Bail  ||  Madras HC Grants Anticipatory Bail to Man Accused of Watching CM Vijay's Unreleased Film Online    

NCLAT, Delhi: Time Period Under Regulation 35A is Directory, Not Mandatory - (27 Apr 2022)

INSOLVENCY

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, has observed that period of time prescribed under Regulation 35A of the IBBI (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) (CIRP) Regulations, 2016 is directory in nature and not mandatory.

Tags : NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL   REGULATION 35A   IBBI (INSOLVENCY RESOLUTION PROCESS FOR CORPORATE PERSONS) (CIRP) REGULATIONS   2016  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved