Supreme Court: Non-Signatory Can Be Bound By an Agreement if Involved in Performing the Contract  ||  Supreme Court: 'Washed-Off Theory' Inapplicable in Assessing Employee Retention Suitability  ||  SC Directs States/UTs to Grant Ex-Servicemen Quota to Cadets Disabled 40% or More in Training  ||  Delhi High Court Quashed Cases over Allegations of Excess Lead Content in Maggi Noodles  ||  Madras High Court: Advocates Cannot Hinder Police From Producing Arrested Lawyers Before a Court  ||  Allahabad HC Awarded Rs. 4.75 Lakh Compensation Over Illegal Vehicle Confiscation in a Beef Case  ||  Allahabad High Court: Strong Suspicion, Not Proof of Guilt, is Sufficient to Frame Charges  ||  Delhi HC: Prior Sanction Not Required Where Cognizance Preceded 2018 PC Act Amendment  ||  Bombay High Court: The Notion of a "Perfect Victim" in Rape Cases is a Myth  ||  Allahabad High Court: Prior Agreement With Inquiry Report Doesn't Vitiate Disciplinary Proceedings    

NCLAT, Delhi: Time Period Under Regulation 35A is Directory, Not Mandatory - (27 Apr 2022)

INSOLVENCY

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, has observed that period of time prescribed under Regulation 35A of the IBBI (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) (CIRP) Regulations, 2016 is directory in nature and not mandatory.

Tags : NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL   REGULATION 35A   IBBI (INSOLVENCY RESOLUTION PROCESS FOR CORPORATE PERSONS) (CIRP) REGULATIONS   2016  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved