MP High Court: Railways Liable for Deaths on Tracks if it Fails to Take Preventive Measures  ||  Ker HC: NDPS Case Stands Even if Contraband Listed in Ml, if Chemical Report Shows Equivalent Weight  ||  Kerala HC: Father’s Retirement Benefits Can Be Attached for Child Maintenance Despite S.60(1)(g) CPC  ||  Supreme Court: A Decree Declared 'Nullity' Can be Challenged at Any Stage, Including Execution  ||  SC Explains How 'Intention' & 'Knowledge' Decide if S.304 IPC Offence is Culpable Homicide Not Murder  ||  NCLAT New Delhi: Public Auction Not Required for Sale of Encumbered Assets if Charge Holders Consent  ||  SC: Rejection of Plaint is Appealable, but no Appeal Lies Against Order Refusing to Reject Plaint  ||  SC Mulls Guidelines After Accused in Lawyers’ Robes Commits Murder in Court Premises  ||  Supreme Court: Subsequent Purchaser Without Due Verification Bound by Previous Sale Agreement  ||  SC: Service Tax Not Applicable on Transfer of Title in Immovable Property    

Allahabad HC: Non-Reporting of Seizure U/S 102 (3) CrPC Doesn't Make Such Seizure Illegal - (26 Apr 2022)

CRIMINAL

Allahabad High Court has ruled that non-reporting of the seizure forthwith, under Section 102(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 shall not ipso facto make such seizure illegal mainly as no period is specified and its consequences have not been provided.

Tags : ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT   SECTION 102(3)   CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE   1973   IPSO FACTO   SEIZURE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved