SC: Suit Alleging Coercion or Undue Influence Cannot be Rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC  ||  Cal HC: Once ED Attachment is Confirmed, Challenge Becomes Academic; PMLA Remedy Must be Pursued  ||  MP HC: Pen-Drive Evidence Cannot be Introduced At a Late Trial Stage Without Proof or Relevance  ||  Calcutta HC: Employee Can't be Stopped From Joining Rival Post-Resignation; Trade Secrets Protected  ||  Calcutta HC: Banks Must Provide Forensic Audit Report Before Calling an Account Fraudulent  ||  Del HC: Woman Cannot Demand Re-Entry to Abandoned Matrimonial Home if Alternate Accommodation Exists  ||  Calcutta HC: Land Acquisition For Industrial Park is Public Purpose; Leasing to Industry is Valid  ||  Patna HC: PwD Recruitment Must Comply With RPwD Act; Executive Resolutions Cannot Override the Law  ||  Madras HC: Individuals Facing Criminal Trial Must Get Court Permission Even to Renew Passports  ||  Calcutta HC: Demolition Orders Cannot be Challenged under Article 226 if a Statutory Appeal Exists    

Kerala HC: Details of Funds in Possession Not Necessary in Plaint for Specific Performance - (26 Apr 2022)

CONTRACT

Kerala High Court has ruled that even if the plaintiff has not provided details of funds in her possession in a suit for specific performance or the way in which she planned to raise them in the plaint, it is not fatal to the suit since those aspects need not be pleaded.

Tags : KERALA HIGH COURT   SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE   POSSESSION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved