Kerala HC: The More Popular You Become, Your Rights Also Diminish to That Extent  ||  SC: Right Claimed Under A. 29 for Preserving Language Can’t Result in an Absolute Right  ||  Bombay High Court: Person Shaking Neck Towards Woman While Riding is Not Stalking  ||  SC: By Operation of S. 31(7)(b), Sum Directed to be Paid Under Arbitral Award Shall Carry Interest  ||  SC: By Operation of S. 31(7)(b), Sum Directed to be Paid Under Arbitral Award Shall Carry Interest  ||  Ker. HC: Physical Contact as Part of Resistance Can’t be Called Explicit Sexual Overture  ||  Delhi High Court: Bail Granted by Court on Merits, if Withheld Will Amount to Punishment  ||  Del. HC: Prosecution and Legal Departments to Exercise Due Diligence before Initiating Cases  ||  BCI Writes Letter to CJI Suggesting Regular Evaluation of Mental Health of Judicial Officers  ||  Delhi High Court: Arbitral Award Set Aside Due to Failure of Arbitrator to Disclose Conflict    

Rajasthan HC: Prosecution Not Required to Seek Corroboration Where Ocular Testimony is Convincing - (21 Apr 2022)

CRIMINAL

Rajasthan High Court has held that it is a well settled principle of criminal jurisprudence that in a case of murder, where ocular testimony is credible, there is no requirement for the prosecution to seek corroboration in the form of motive and recovery.

Tags : RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT   CRIMINAL JURISPRUDENCE   OCULAR TESTIMONY   CORROBORATION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved