Supreme Court: Multiple Cases Alone Cannot Justify an Externment Order  ||  Supreme Court: Certiorari Can Quash a Tribunal Decision That is Grossly Perverse  ||  Supreme Court: Informant’s Consent is Not Required to Quash a Case Settled With the Victim  ||  Madras High Court: False Posts Against a Minister are Not an Offence Without Intent to Cause Alarm  ||  Delhi High Court: Police Cannot Pick and Choose Among Accused Persons for Arrest  ||  J&K High Court: Bar Associations are Not ‘State’ under Article 12 and are Outside Writ Jurisdiction  ||  Calcutta High Court: Third Parties Can Challenge Inaction Against Unauthorised Construction  ||  Madras High Court: Being an Advocate Does Not Mean a Person Cannot Commit an Offence  ||  Delhi High Court: Husband Cannot Reopen Settled Marital Disputes to Avoid Maintenance Liability  ||  Calcutta High Court: State Cannot Deny CRMI Seats to Foreign Medical Graduates Citing Stipend Costs    

Delhi HC Dismisses Red Bull Application for Interim Injunction Against PepsiCo - (12 Apr 2022)

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS

Delhi High Court has dismissed Red Bull AG's application for interim injunction against PepsiCo India, holding that prima facie, the latter's tagline, stimulates mind, energizes body, on their energy drink, Sting, does not infringe the former's Trademark in tagline, vitalize body and mind.

Tags : DELHI HIGH COURT   RED BULL   INTERIM INJUNCTION   PEPSICO INDIA   TAGLINE   ENERGY DRINK  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved