Supreme Court: Section 17A PC Act Does Not Cover Bribe Demands Unrelated to Official Duty  ||  Supreme Court Directs Centre to Promote Interim Compensation Scheme for Road Accident Victims  ||  Karnataka High Court Upholds Homicide Charge Against Father for Letting Minor Son Drive  ||  Karnataka High Court Grants Bail to Pan Masala Maker in Rs. 42 Crore Cess Evasion Case  ||  Karnataka High Court: Advocates Practising Without Clearing AIBE May Face Criminal Action  ||  Allahabad HC Orders Scrutiny of UP Basic School Teachers’ Educational and Appointment Records  ||  AP HC: Fabricated Sale Agreements and Breach of Property Undertaking Constitute Perjury  ||  Supreme Court: State Cannot Acquire Temple Property Through Gift Deed  ||  Supreme Court: HC Registry Should Exclude Court Vacations When Listing Cases After Fixed Days  ||  Supreme Court Flags Stark Non-Compliance With Directions on CAPF Cadre Review    

Delhi HC: Concurrent Registration of Same or Similar Trademark Not Per Se Barred - (11 Apr 2022)

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS

Delhi High Court has held that if two Trade Marks are validly registered, both the registered proprietors can use the Trade Marks to the exclusivity of third parties, but cannot affirm their rights against each other.

Tags : DELHI HIGH COURT   TRADE MARKS   EXCLUSIVITY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved