SC: Ex-Contract Workers Must Be Preferred When Employers Replace Contract Labour With Regular Staff  ||  SC: Waqf Tribunals Cannot Hear Claims over Properties Not Listed or Registered under Waqf Act  ||  Supreme Court: Stray Dog Attacks on Beaches Adversely Impact Tourism  ||  Chhattisgarh HC: Court Employees Cannot Enroll as Regular LLB Students in Breach of Service Rules  ||  Kerala HC: Telling Someone to "Go Away And Die" in Anger Does Not Amount to Abetment of Suicide  ||  Kerala HC: High Courts Work On Holidays; Denying Compensatory Leave To Officers Violates Art. 229  ||  Del HC: Probationers are ‘Workmen’ under ID Act; S.17B Wages not Recoverable if Termination Upheld  ||  Supreme Court: Confession Without Corroboration Cannot Form the Basis of Conviction  ||  SC: Higher Land Acquisition Compensation to Some Owners Cannot Invalidate Awards to Others  ||  SC: Prior Written Demand is Not Mandatory For an Industrial Dispute to Exist or be Referred    

Delhi HC: Continuing Cause of Action in Trademark Suits No Defence to Multiple Proceedings - (11 Apr 2022)

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS

Delhi High Court has held that a trademark owner cannot drag a Defendant to multiple fora, being a higher court or before a court of coordinate jurisdiction, when the matter is pending before the first Court, when the matter is part heard before the first Court, to find a forum to get relief.

Tags : DELHI HIGH COURT   TRADEMARK OWNER   MULTIPLE FORA   COORDINATE JURISDICTION   FORUM  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved