J&K&L HC: Undenied Pleadings are Deemed Admitted by Implication under the CPC  ||  Kerala HC: Transfer Order Pending Disciplinary Proceedings Cannot be Disguised as Punishment  ||  Allahabad HC: GST, Incentives, 0r Festival Advances Cannot be Deducted From Employee’s Retiral Dues  ||  SC: Absconding Accused Cannot Claim Anticipatory Bail Solely Because a Co-Accused Was Acquitted  ||  Supreme Court: District Cricket Bodies Must Adopt Good Governance Voluntarily, Not Follow BCCI Rules  ||  Supreme Court: Post-Award Property Purchasers Cannot Resist Execution of an Arbitral Award  ||  SC: Telecom Spectrum is a Community Resource and its Ownership Cannot be Decided under the IBC  ||  SC: Police Failure to Invoke IPC Provisions Led to Contractor’s Acquittal in Cement Stockpiling Case  ||  SC: Bank’s Internal Classification of Debt as NPA Does Not Determine Limitation under the IBC  ||  Bombay HC: Clarifies Procedure for Executing Foreign Decrees    

Delhi HC: Continuing Cause of Action in Trademark Suits No Defence to Multiple Proceedings - (11 Apr 2022)

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS

Delhi High Court has held that a trademark owner cannot drag a Defendant to multiple fora, being a higher court or before a court of coordinate jurisdiction, when the matter is pending before the first Court, when the matter is part heard before the first Court, to find a forum to get relief.

Tags : DELHI HIGH COURT   TRADEMARK OWNER   MULTIPLE FORA   COORDINATE JURISDICTION   FORUM  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved