Delhi High Court: Providing Email Services Does Not Make Google a Public Functionary  ||  Patna HC: Lying on a Woman Without Any Act Toward Penetration Rules Out Attempted Rape  ||  Delhi High Court: Litigants Cannot Claim a Bench Change as a Right After Roster Changes  ||  Calcutta High Court: Peaceful Protest is a Democratic Right and Cannot Be Treated as an Offence  ||  Delhi High Court: Trial Courts Must Verify an Accused’s Address Before Declaring Absconding  ||  Gujarat High Court: Judicial Officer Cannot Seek HC Judge’s Transfer over Housing Grievance  ||  Delhi High Court Orders 125 Websites Using Jio Trademark for Lottery and Gaming to Be Suspended  ||  MP High Court Strikes Down 27% OBC Quota, Restores Reservation to 14%  ||  Supreme Court: Hindu Widow’s Limited Estate Became Absolute under Succession Act  ||  Supreme Court: Prima Facie Arbitration Agreement Requires Referral to Arbitration    

P&H HC: Call Conversations Between Co-Accused Sans Transcript Not Corroborative Material - (11 Apr 2022)

NARCOTICS

Punjab and Haryana High Court has held that sans the transcript of the conversations between the co-accused, mere call details would not be considered to be corroborative material in absence of substantive material against the accused under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act,1985.

Tags : PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT   TRANSCRIPT   CORROBORATIVE MATERIAL   NARCOTIC DRUGS AND PSYCHOTROPIC SUBSTANCES ACT  1985  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved