Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal, Holds Investigating Officer Cannot Create Evidence  ||  Supreme Court: NDPS Prosecution Cannot Be Quashed Solely Over Co-Accused’s Disclosure  ||  SC: Tax Classification Depends on Goods' Form at Sale, not their End Use  ||  Delhi High Court: No Material Showing Delhi Police Compromised the 2020 Riots Probe  ||  Madras HC Suggests Mandatory Attachment of Properties Suspected to Be Proceeds of Corruption  ||  P&H High Court: Demolition After Lawyer Flagged Corruption Appears Aimed at Silencing Him  ||  Calcutta High Court: Contempt Proceedings Cannot Be Used to Challenge Orders or Attack Judges  ||  Orissa High Court: Marriage Need Not Be Preserved When the Relationship Has Substantially Eroded  ||  SC: CIRP Can Continue Despite Fraudulent Insolvency Plea That Triggered It  ||  Delhi HC: Senior Citizen May Seek Eviction of Daughter-in-Law for Ill-Treatment    

P&H HC: Call Conversations Between Co-Accused Sans Transcript Not Corroborative Material - (11 Apr 2022)

NARCOTICS

Punjab and Haryana High Court has held that sans the transcript of the conversations between the co-accused, mere call details would not be considered to be corroborative material in absence of substantive material against the accused under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act,1985.

Tags : PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT   TRANSCRIPT   CORROBORATIVE MATERIAL   NARCOTIC DRUGS AND PSYCHOTROPIC SUBSTANCES ACT  1985  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved