Supreme Court: State Must Be Impleaded When Relief is Sought From Public Exchequer  ||  SC: Student Fees Cannot Be Increased Mid-Course Except in Exceptional Circumstances  ||  Supreme Court: ED's Delay in Sending Arrest Order Does Not By Itself Invalidate Arrest  ||  Supreme Court: Appeal Limitation Runs From NCLAT Order Pronouncement, Not Certified Copy Receipt  ||  Gujarat High Court: Waqf Tribunal Has No Supervisory Authority Over Waqf Board  ||  Kerala High Court Orders Aadhaar Fingerprint Comparison to Trace Sreekrishnapuram Murder Culprits  ||  Delhi High Court: Unnatural Death at Police Station Alone Cannot Establish Police Negligence  ||  Orissa High Court: Teacher Scolding Student for Intoxicant Use is Not Suicide Abetment  ||  Supreme Court: Drug Users are Victims and Focus Must Be on Breaking the Supply Chain  ||  Supreme Court: Non-Signatories May Join Arbitration When the Dispute Affects Their Rights    

P&H HC: Call Conversations Between Co-Accused Sans Transcript Not Corroborative Material - (11 Apr 2022)

NARCOTICS

Punjab and Haryana High Court has held that sans the transcript of the conversations between the co-accused, mere call details would not be considered to be corroborative material in absence of substantive material against the accused under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act,1985.

Tags : PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT   TRANSCRIPT   CORROBORATIVE MATERIAL   NARCOTIC DRUGS AND PSYCHOTROPIC SUBSTANCES ACT  1985  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved