NCLAT: Can’t Dismiss Restoration App. if Filed in 30 Days from Date of Dismissal of Original App.  ||  Delhi HC: Communication between Parties through Whatsapp Constitute Valid Agreement  ||  Delhi HC Seeks Response from Govt. Over Penalties on Petrol Pumps Supplying Fuel to Old Vehicles  ||  Centre Notifies "Unified Waqf Management, Empowerment, Efficiency and Development Rules, 2025"  ||  Del. HC: Can’t Reject TM Owner’s Claim Merely because Defendant Could have Sought Removal of Mark  ||  Bombay HC: Cannot Treat Sole Director of OPC, Parallelly with Separate Legal Entity  ||  Delhi HC: Can Apply 'Family of Marks' Concept to Injunct Specific Marks  ||  HP HC: Can’t Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree for Mere Irregularity  ||  Cal. HC: Order by HC Bench Not Conferred With Determination by Roster is Void  ||  Calcutta HC: Purchase Order Including Arbitration Agreement to Prevail Over Tax Invoice Lacking it    

P&H HC: Call Conversations Between Co-Accused Sans Transcript Not Corroborative Material - (11 Apr 2022)

NARCOTICS

Punjab and Haryana High Court has held that sans the transcript of the conversations between the co-accused, mere call details would not be considered to be corroborative material in absence of substantive material against the accused under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act,1985.

Tags : PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT   TRANSCRIPT   CORROBORATIVE MATERIAL   NARCOTIC DRUGS AND PSYCHOTROPIC SUBSTANCES ACT  1985  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved