Supreme Court: Uncrystallized Contractual Damages Not an Operational Debt under Section 9 IBC  ||  Supreme Court: Interest Accrued in Suspense Account After NPA Classification is Recoverable as Debt  ||  Supreme Court: S.69 GST Arrest Order with “Reasons to Believe” Must Precede Arrest  ||  Supreme Court: Winding-Up Proceedings Period Cannot be Excluded under Section 14 Limitation Act  ||  Supreme Court: Separate Appeals Unnecessary Against Common Judgment on Suit and Counterclaim  ||  Supreme Court: Unsuccessful Party Can Seek Post-Award Section 9 Relief in Exceptional Cases  ||  Delhi HC Rejects Black Money Act Challenge, Imposes Rs. 60,000 Costs over Prosecution Avoidance  ||  Delhi HC Affirms Teacher's POCSO Conviction, Urges Schools to Encourage Children to Speak Up  ||  Kerala HC: NGO Funding Peaceful Protests Can't Justify FCRA Renewal Denial  ||  Delhi HC: Courts Cannot Judge Sufficiency of Material For Issuing Look Out Circular    

Delhi HC: Application for Leave to Serve Interrogatories Need Not be Decided Ex-Parte - (07 Apr 2022)

CIVIL

Delhi High Court has held that no prescription in law, either statutory or precedential, that inhibits from issuing notice under Order XI Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 seeking leave to serve interrogatories on the opposite party, before deciding whether to grant or refuse to grant leave.

Tags : DELHI HIGH COURT   STATUTORY   PRECEDENTIAL   ORDER XI RULE 1 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE   1908   PRESCRIPTION IN LAW  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved