SC: Under Order XXI Rule 102 CPC, A Transferee Pendente Lite Cannot Obstruct Execution of a Decree  ||  SC: RTE Act promotes fraternity and equality by children of judges and vendors studying together  ||  MP High Court: Aadhaar and Voter ID Cards are Not Definitive Proof of Date of Birth  ||  Chhattisgarh HC: Second Marriage During Subsisting First Marriage Void Unless Custom Permits It  ||  Allahabad HC: Will in Favor of Someone Does Not Affect Compassionate Appointment Based on Dependency  ||  MP High Court: Mere Illness of a Family Member, If Improving, is Not Sufficient for Interim Bail  ||  Bombay HC: ?25K Fine for Flying Kites With Nylon Manjha; Parents Must Ensure Responsible Conduct  ||  Delhi High Court: Home State Must be the First Preference For Claiming Insider IFS Cadre Allocation  ||  SC: Hindu Daughter-In-Law Widowed After Her Father-In-Law’s Death is Entitled to Maintenance  ||  SC: Vendor Remains a Necessary Party in Specific Performance Suits Even After Transferring Property    

Delhi HC: Application for Leave to Serve Interrogatories Need Not be Decided Ex-Parte - (07 Apr 2022)

CIVIL

Delhi High Court has held that no prescription in law, either statutory or precedential, that inhibits from issuing notice under Order XI Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 seeking leave to serve interrogatories on the opposite party, before deciding whether to grant or refuse to grant leave.

Tags : DELHI HIGH COURT   STATUTORY   PRECEDENTIAL   ORDER XI RULE 1 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE   1908   PRESCRIPTION IN LAW  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved