Supreme Court: Award Valid Even If Passed After Mandate Expiry When Court Extends Time  ||  Jharkhand HC: Regular Bail Plea During Interim Bail is Not Maintainable under Section 483 BNSS  ||  Cal HC: Theft Claims and Public Humiliation Alone Don’t Amount To Abetment of Suicide U/S 306 IPC  ||  Delhi High Court: Elective Surgery Does Not Bar Grant of Interim Bail on Medical Grounds  ||  Delhi HC: Consensual Romance With Minor Nearing 18 May be Considered For Bail in POCSO Case  ||  Delhi HC: Not Named In FIR Doesn’t Matter If Financial Links Show Active Role in NDPS Offence  ||  Chhattisgarh HC: Rape is an Affront to Womanhood and a Brutal Violation of The Right To Life  ||  Supreme Court: Single Insolvency Petition Maintainable Against Linked Corporate Entities  ||  Supreme Court: Disputes are Not Arbitrable When the Arbitration Agreement is Alleged to be Forged  ||  Supreme Court: Temple Trust Does Not Qualify as an ‘Industry’ under the Industrial Disputes Act    

Delhi HC: Application for Leave to Serve Interrogatories Need Not be Decided Ex-Parte - (07 Apr 2022)

CIVIL

Delhi High Court has held that no prescription in law, either statutory or precedential, that inhibits from issuing notice under Order XI Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 seeking leave to serve interrogatories on the opposite party, before deciding whether to grant or refuse to grant leave.

Tags : DELHI HIGH COURT   STATUTORY   PRECEDENTIAL   ORDER XI RULE 1 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE   1908   PRESCRIPTION IN LAW  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved