SC: ‘Abandonment of Service is Not Voluntary Retirement’, Denying SBI Clerk Pension Benefits  ||  Supreme Court: Stranger Affected by an Interim Order is Entitled to be Impleaded in Writ Proceedings  ||  Supreme Court: Courts Cannot Replace an Authority’s Discretion, and Sets Aside Direction to Governor  ||  SC: Title Suit Hit by Constructive Res Judicata if Omitted in Prior Injunction Suit Disputing Title  ||  SC Clarifies Whether a Co-Operative Society Can Act as a Resolution Applicant under the IBC  ||  Chhattisgarh High Court: Innocent Litigants Should Not be Penalized For Lapses by Their Lawyers  ||  Delhi High Court: Marriage With the Victim Cannot Absolve an Accused of Rape under POCSO  ||  J&K&L HC: Acquisition Lapses if 80% Compensation is Unpaid Before Possession under Section 17A  ||  Delhi HC: Policy Number is Not Mandatory For LIC Details under RTI, But Basic Details are Required  ||  SC: Courts Must Curb Unlicensed Money Lenders; Probes Need Not Wait For New Law    

Delhi HC: Application for Leave to Serve Interrogatories Need Not be Decided Ex-Parte - (07 Apr 2022)

CIVIL

Delhi High Court has held that no prescription in law, either statutory or precedential, that inhibits from issuing notice under Order XI Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 seeking leave to serve interrogatories on the opposite party, before deciding whether to grant or refuse to grant leave.

Tags : DELHI HIGH COURT   STATUTORY   PRECEDENTIAL   ORDER XI RULE 1 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE   1908   PRESCRIPTION IN LAW  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved