Del HC Declines Assess. Issued in Wrong Name after Entity’s Merger, Distinguishes from SC Judgment  ||  Del. HC: Whether an Entity is a Permanent Establishment of Foreign Company is a Fact Specific Issue  ||  Del. HC: Mindset that Women should Endure Suffering is ‘Right’ Emboldens Perpetrators  ||  Ker HC: Can’t Lay Down Ratio that Allegations against Relatives of Husband are to be Viewed as False  ||  Del. HC: S. 129 of GST Act Can’t be Interpreted as Being Intended to Override Section 126 of GST Act  ||  Cal. HC: Once Seat of Arbitration is Designated it is to be Treated as Exclusive Jurisdiction  ||  Delhi HC Rules in Favour of ‘India Gate’ Brand in Trademark Infringement Suit  ||  Cal. HC: Tribunal Can Exercise Power to Correct Computation Error Suo Moto u/s 33 of Arbitration Act  ||  SC: High Time that Investigating Agencies are Sensitised About Law Laid Down u/s 306 of IPC  ||  SC: Jharkhand Government to bring Prison Manual in Accordance with Model Prison Manual 2016    

SC: Absence of Arbitration Agreement Make Article 137 of Limitation Act Inapplicable to Arbitration - (07 Apr 2022)

ARBITRATION

Supreme Court has observed that Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963 would be inapplicable in arbitration proceedings commenced under Bihar Public Works Contracts Disputes Arbitration Tribunal Act, 2008 when there isn’t any arbitration agreement between the parties.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   ARTICLE 137 OF THE LIMITATION ACT   1963   BIHAR PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTS DISPUTES ARBITRATION TRIBUNAL   ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved