Supreme Court: Award Valid Even If Passed After Mandate Expiry When Court Extends Time  ||  Jharkhand HC: Regular Bail Plea During Interim Bail is Not Maintainable under Section 483 BNSS  ||  Cal HC: Theft Claims and Public Humiliation Alone Don’t Amount To Abetment of Suicide U/S 306 IPC  ||  Delhi High Court: Elective Surgery Does Not Bar Grant of Interim Bail on Medical Grounds  ||  Delhi HC: Consensual Romance With Minor Nearing 18 May be Considered For Bail in POCSO Case  ||  Delhi HC: Not Named In FIR Doesn’t Matter If Financial Links Show Active Role in NDPS Offence  ||  Chhattisgarh HC: Rape is an Affront to Womanhood and a Brutal Violation of The Right To Life  ||  Supreme Court: Single Insolvency Petition Maintainable Against Linked Corporate Entities  ||  Supreme Court: Disputes are Not Arbitrable When the Arbitration Agreement is Alleged to be Forged  ||  Supreme Court: Temple Trust Does Not Qualify as an ‘Industry’ under the Industrial Disputes Act    

SC: Absence of Arbitration Agreement Make Article 137 of Limitation Act Inapplicable to Arbitration - (07 Apr 2022)

ARBITRATION

Supreme Court has observed that Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963 would be inapplicable in arbitration proceedings commenced under Bihar Public Works Contracts Disputes Arbitration Tribunal Act, 2008 when there isn’t any arbitration agreement between the parties.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   ARTICLE 137 OF THE LIMITATION ACT   1963   BIHAR PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTS DISPUTES ARBITRATION TRIBUNAL   ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved