Supreme Court: Multiple Cases Alone Cannot Justify an Externment Order  ||  Supreme Court: Certiorari Can Quash a Tribunal Decision That is Grossly Perverse  ||  Supreme Court: Informant’s Consent is Not Required to Quash a Case Settled With the Victim  ||  Madras High Court: False Posts Against a Minister are Not an Offence Without Intent to Cause Alarm  ||  Delhi High Court: Police Cannot Pick and Choose Among Accused Persons for Arrest  ||  J&K High Court: Bar Associations are Not ‘State’ under Article 12 and are Outside Writ Jurisdiction  ||  Calcutta High Court: Third Parties Can Challenge Inaction Against Unauthorised Construction  ||  Madras High Court: Being an Advocate Does Not Mean a Person Cannot Commit an Offence  ||  Delhi High Court: Husband Cannot Reopen Settled Marital Disputes to Avoid Maintenance Liability  ||  Calcutta High Court: State Cannot Deny CRMI Seats to Foreign Medical Graduates Citing Stipend Costs    

CCI Orders Probe Against Zomato and Swiggy On Complaint of Anti-Competitive Practices - (06 Apr 2022)

MRTP/ COMPETITION LAWS

Competition Commission of India has directed the Director General (DG) to investigate and determine whether the conduct of Zomato and Swiggy are anti-competitive in terms of Section 3(1) and Section 3(4) of the Competition Act, 2002.

Tags : COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA   DIRECTOR GENERAL   ZOMATO   SWIGGY   ANTI-COMPETITIVE   SECTION 3(1) AND SECTION 3(4) OF THE COMPETITION ACT   2002  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved