Supreme Court: Non-Signatory That is Not a Veritable Party Cannot Invoke an Arbitration Clause  ||  SC: Bail Can't be Cancelled For Police Non-Appearance Once Chargesheet is Filed and Trial is Attended  ||  SC: New Arbitration Bill Fails To Provide a Statutory Appeal Against Tribunal Termination Orders  ||  SC: Employees Who Resign or Retire After Five Years of Service Are Entitled to Receive Gratuity  ||  SC: Employees Who Resign or Retire After Five Years of Service Are Entitled to Receive Gratuity  ||  Supreme Court: Higher Courts Should Avoid Unnecessary Remand of Cases to Lower Courts  ||  J&K&L HC: Under SARFAESI Act, Borrower's Right To Redeem a Secured Asset Ends With Auction Notice  ||  Calcutta HC: Income Tax Returns Can Be Used to Assess Victim's Income; ?39 Lakh Compensation Granted  ||  Delhi HC: Woman's Right to a Shared Household Does Not Allow Indefinite Occupation of In-Laws' Home  ||  Delhi HC: Director Disputes in a Company Do Not Qualify as Genuine Hardship to Delay ITR Filing    

CCI Orders Probe Against Zomato and Swiggy On Complaint of Anti-Competitive Practices - (06 Apr 2022)

MRTP/ COMPETITION LAWS

Competition Commission of India has directed the Director General (DG) to investigate and determine whether the conduct of Zomato and Swiggy are anti-competitive in terms of Section 3(1) and Section 3(4) of the Competition Act, 2002.

Tags : COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA   DIRECTOR GENERAL   ZOMATO   SWIGGY   ANTI-COMPETITIVE   SECTION 3(1) AND SECTION 3(4) OF THE COMPETITION ACT   2002  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved