Supreme Court: Award Valid Even If Passed After Mandate Expiry When Court Extends Time  ||  Jharkhand HC: Regular Bail Plea During Interim Bail is Not Maintainable under Section 483 BNSS  ||  Cal HC: Theft Claims and Public Humiliation Alone Don’t Amount To Abetment of Suicide U/S 306 IPC  ||  Delhi High Court: Elective Surgery Does Not Bar Grant of Interim Bail on Medical Grounds  ||  Delhi HC: Consensual Romance With Minor Nearing 18 May be Considered For Bail in POCSO Case  ||  Delhi HC: Not Named In FIR Doesn’t Matter If Financial Links Show Active Role in NDPS Offence  ||  Chhattisgarh HC: Rape is an Affront to Womanhood and a Brutal Violation of The Right To Life  ||  Supreme Court: Single Insolvency Petition Maintainable Against Linked Corporate Entities  ||  Supreme Court: Disputes are Not Arbitrable When the Arbitration Agreement is Alleged to be Forged  ||  Supreme Court: Temple Trust Does Not Qualify as an ‘Industry’ under the Industrial Disputes Act    

CCI Orders Probe Against Zomato and Swiggy On Complaint of Anti-Competitive Practices - (06 Apr 2022)

MRTP/ COMPETITION LAWS

Competition Commission of India has directed the Director General (DG) to investigate and determine whether the conduct of Zomato and Swiggy are anti-competitive in terms of Section 3(1) and Section 3(4) of the Competition Act, 2002.

Tags : COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA   DIRECTOR GENERAL   ZOMATO   SWIGGY   ANTI-COMPETITIVE   SECTION 3(1) AND SECTION 3(4) OF THE COMPETITION ACT   2002  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved