PIL Seeking ‘Authoritative Interpretation’ of Section 66 PMLA Refused by Delhi High Court  ||  All. HC: Can’t Declare Transaction Benami on Contractor’s Statement Without Relevant Material  ||  Del. HC: Denying ITC to Taxpayers One of the Outcomes of GST Registration Cancell. with Retrospect  ||  Cal HC: Penalty Amount on Higher Value than Invoice Value Can’t be Computed by GST Dep. w/o Evidence  ||  All. HC: Candidates with Criminal Background Will Pose Severe Threat to Democracy if Elected  ||  All. HC: It’s an Obligation of Bank Officials to Fully Co-operate in Criminal Investigations  ||  SC: Prima Facie Case Made Out from Allegations in Complaint Sufficient to Summon Accused  ||  Supreme Court Explains: Debt Becoming Financial & Operational Debt  ||  P&H HC: Model Code of Conduct Can’t Stand in Way of Execution of Judicial Order  ||  Chh. HC: Can’t Build Matrimonial Home With Bricks & Stones, Love & Respect Between Spouses Required    

State of Karnataka v. Common Cause and Ors. etc. etc. - (Supreme Court) (18 Mar 2016)

Getting acquainted with yet more happy faces in government ads

Civil

The Supreme Court nullified to a great extent its order from 2015 against the publishing of photographs of higher-ups in the three pillars of government. In a short order, Justice Gogoi and Justice Ghose permitted publication of photographs of Governors and Chief Ministers of States in addition to those of the President, Prime Minister and Chief Justice India, subject to their approval. Also can be included images of concerned Union or State Ministers, in lieu of the Prime Minister or Chief Minister of the respective State.

Relevant : Common Cause v. Union of India (UOI) MANU/SC/0604/2015 Naresh Shridhar Mirajkar and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra and Ors. MANU/SC/0044/1966

Tags : GOVERNMENT   ADVERTISING   PHOTOGRAPHS   MINISTERS  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved