SC: Suit Alleging Coercion or Undue Influence Cannot be Rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC  ||  Cal HC: Once ED Attachment is Confirmed, Challenge Becomes Academic; PMLA Remedy Must be Pursued  ||  MP HC: Pen-Drive Evidence Cannot be Introduced At a Late Trial Stage Without Proof or Relevance  ||  Calcutta HC: Employee Can't be Stopped From Joining Rival Post-Resignation; Trade Secrets Protected  ||  Calcutta HC: Banks Must Provide Forensic Audit Report Before Calling an Account Fraudulent  ||  Del HC: Woman Cannot Demand Re-Entry to Abandoned Matrimonial Home if Alternate Accommodation Exists  ||  Calcutta HC: Land Acquisition For Industrial Park is Public Purpose; Leasing to Industry is Valid  ||  Patna HC: PwD Recruitment Must Comply With RPwD Act; Executive Resolutions Cannot Override the Law  ||  Madras HC: Individuals Facing Criminal Trial Must Get Court Permission Even to Renew Passports  ||  Calcutta HC: Demolition Orders Cannot be Challenged under Article 226 if a Statutory Appeal Exists    

MP HC: Condition of Living in Separation for One Year Can't be Waived - (31 Mar 2022)

FAMILY

Madhya Pradesh High Court has held that one year period of living separately is a must for filing of an application for divorce by mutual consent under Section 13B(1) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and that waiver of this period under Section 14 of the Act is not permitted.

Tags : MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT   MUTUAL CONSENT   DIVORCE   SECTION 13B(1) OF THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved