J&K&L HC: Matrimonial Remedies May Overlap, But Cruelty Claims Cannot be Selectively Invoked  ||  Delhi High Court: Customs Officials Acting Officially Cannot be Cross-Examined as of Right  ||  J&K&L HC: Second Arbitral Reference is Maintainable if Award is Set Aside Without Deciding Merits  ||  J&K&L HC: Gold Voluntarily Given to Customer is 'Entrustment'; Theft Excluded from Insurance Cover  ||  Delhi HC: Working Mothers Cannot be Forced to Bear Full Childcare Burden While Fathers Evade Duty  ||  J&K&L HC: Arbitral Tribunal Not a “Court”; Giving False Evidence Before it Doesn’t Attract S.195 CrPC  ||  Calcutta HC: Award May Be Set Aside if Tribunal Rewrites Contract or Ignores Key Clauses  ||  Delhi HC Suspends Kuldeep Singh Sengar’s Life Term, Holding Section 5(C) of POCSO Not Made Out  ||  Calcutta High Court: Arbitration Clause in an Expired Lease Cannot be Invoked For a Fresh Lease  ||  Delhi High Court: 120-Day Timeline under Section 132B Of Income Tax Act is Not Mandatory    

MP HC: Condition of Living in Separation for One Year Can't be Waived - (31 Mar 2022)

FAMILY

Madhya Pradesh High Court has held that one year period of living separately is a must for filing of an application for divorce by mutual consent under Section 13B(1) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and that waiver of this period under Section 14 of the Act is not permitted.

Tags : MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT   MUTUAL CONSENT   DIVORCE   SECTION 13B(1) OF THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved