SC: Suit Alleging Coercion or Undue Influence Cannot be Rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC  ||  Cal HC: Once ED Attachment is Confirmed, Challenge Becomes Academic; PMLA Remedy Must be Pursued  ||  MP HC: Pen-Drive Evidence Cannot be Introduced At a Late Trial Stage Without Proof or Relevance  ||  Calcutta HC: Employee Can't be Stopped From Joining Rival Post-Resignation; Trade Secrets Protected  ||  Calcutta HC: Banks Must Provide Forensic Audit Report Before Calling an Account Fraudulent  ||  Del HC: Woman Cannot Demand Re-Entry to Abandoned Matrimonial Home if Alternate Accommodation Exists  ||  Calcutta HC: Land Acquisition For Industrial Park is Public Purpose; Leasing to Industry is Valid  ||  Patna HC: PwD Recruitment Must Comply With RPwD Act; Executive Resolutions Cannot Override the Law  ||  Madras HC: Individuals Facing Criminal Trial Must Get Court Permission Even to Renew Passports  ||  Calcutta HC: Demolition Orders Cannot be Challenged under Article 226 if a Statutory Appeal Exists    

SEBI mulls Brightline Tests for Acquisition of ‘Control’- (Securities and Exchange Board of India) (14 Mar 2016)

Capital Market

The Securities and Exchange Board of India released a discussion paper inviting comments on proposals related to Brightline Tests for Acquisition of ‘Control’ under the SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations 2011. The Board seeks to address complexities that arise when the control of a company accrues in an entity through contractual agreements. It hopes to better define ‘control’ under the Regulations, without legislating an exhaustive list to try and address all situations.

Tags : BRIGHTLINE TEST   CONTROL   ACQUISITION CONTRACTUAL  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved