NCLT: Suspended Directors Who are Prospective Resolution Applicants Cann’t Access Valuation Reports  ||  Supreme Court Clarifies Test For Granting Bail to Accused Added at Trial under Section 319 CrPC  ||  SC: Fresh Notification For Vijayawada ACB Police Station not Required After AP Bifurcation  ||  SC: Studying in a Government Institute Does Not Create an Automatic Right to a Government Job  ||  NCLT Mumbai: CIRP Claims Cannot Invoke the 12-Year Limitation Period For Enforcing Mortgage Rights  ||  NCLAT: Misnaming Guarantor as 'Director' in SARFAESI Notice Doesn't Void Guarantee Invocation  ||  Jharkhand HC: Mere Breach of Compromise Terms by an Accused Does Not Justify Bail Cancellation  ||  Cal HC: Banks Cannot Freeze a Company's Accounts Solely Due To ROC Labeling a 'Management Dispute'  ||  Rajasthan HC: Father’s Rape of His Daughter Transcends Ordinary Crime; Victim’s Testimony Suffices  ||  Delhi HC: Judge Who Reserved Judgment Must Deliver Verdict Despite Transfer; Successor Can't Rehear    

SEBI mulls Brightline Tests for Acquisition of ‘Control’- (Securities and Exchange Board of India) (14 Mar 2016)

Capital Market

The Securities and Exchange Board of India released a discussion paper inviting comments on proposals related to Brightline Tests for Acquisition of ‘Control’ under the SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations 2011. The Board seeks to address complexities that arise when the control of a company accrues in an entity through contractual agreements. It hopes to better define ‘control’ under the Regulations, without legislating an exhaustive list to try and address all situations.

Tags : BRIGHTLINE TEST   CONTROL   ACQUISITION CONTRACTUAL  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved