J&K&L HC: Matrimonial Remedies May Overlap, But Cruelty Claims Cannot be Selectively Invoked  ||  Delhi High Court: Customs Officials Acting Officially Cannot be Cross-Examined as of Right  ||  J&K&L HC: Second Arbitral Reference is Maintainable if Award is Set Aside Without Deciding Merits  ||  J&K&L HC: Gold Voluntarily Given to Customer is 'Entrustment'; Theft Excluded from Insurance Cover  ||  Delhi HC: Working Mothers Cannot be Forced to Bear Full Childcare Burden While Fathers Evade Duty  ||  J&K&L HC: Arbitral Tribunal Not a “Court”; Giving False Evidence Before it Doesn’t Attract S.195 CrPC  ||  Calcutta HC: Award May Be Set Aside if Tribunal Rewrites Contract or Ignores Key Clauses  ||  Delhi HC Suspends Kuldeep Singh Sengar’s Life Term, Holding Section 5(C) of POCSO Not Made Out  ||  Calcutta High Court: Arbitration Clause in an Expired Lease Cannot be Invoked For a Fresh Lease  ||  Delhi High Court: 120-Day Timeline under Section 132B Of Income Tax Act is Not Mandatory    

SEBI mulls Brightline Tests for Acquisition of ‘Control’- (Securities and Exchange Board of India) (14 Mar 2016)

Capital Market

The Securities and Exchange Board of India released a discussion paper inviting comments on proposals related to Brightline Tests for Acquisition of ‘Control’ under the SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations 2011. The Board seeks to address complexities that arise when the control of a company accrues in an entity through contractual agreements. It hopes to better define ‘control’ under the Regulations, without legislating an exhaustive list to try and address all situations.

Tags : BRIGHTLINE TEST   CONTROL   ACQUISITION CONTRACTUAL  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved