Calcutta HC: Award May Be Set Aside if Tribunal Rewrites Contract or Ignores Key Clauses  ||  Delhi HC Suspends Kuldeep Singh Sengar’s Life Term, Holding Section 5(C) of POCSO Not Made Out  ||  Calcutta High Court: Arbitration Clause in an Expired Lease Cannot be Invoked For a Fresh Lease  ||  Delhi High Court: 120-Day Timeline under Section 132B Of Income Tax Act is Not Mandatory  ||  NCLAT Reaffirms That Borrower's Debt Acknowledgment Also Extends Limitation Period for Guarantors  ||  NCLAT: Oppression & Mismanagement Petition Cannot Be Filed Without Company Membership on Filing Date  ||  Supreme Court Quashes Rajasthan Village Renaming, Says Government Must Follow its Own Policy  ||  NCLAT: NCLT Can Order Forensic Audit on its Own, No Separate Application Required  ||  NCLAT Reiterates That IBC Cannot be Invoked as a Recovery Tool for Contractual Disputes  ||  Delhi HC: DRI or Central Revenues Control Lab Presence in Delhi Alone Does Not Confer Jurisdiction    

Real estate bill passed, aadhaar number changes rejected - (15 Mar 2016)

MANU/PIBU/0321/2016

The Parliament kept up its newfound legislation fervour, approving the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Bill, 2016, which aside from providing a forum for builders and buyers to sort out their differences will also encourage respecting contractual obligations in the real estate sector. The Lok Sabha also confirmed passage of the Aadhaar (Targeted Delivery of Financial and Other Subsidies, Benefits and Services) Bill, 2016 by a voice vote. Having previously passed it as a money bill, the Rajya Sabha could only suggest amendments to the Bill, which were rejected by the Lok Sabha.

The Companies (Amendment) Bill, 2016 was introduced in Lok Sabha on 16 March 2016. The Bill addresses concerns about stringent compliance requirements, in efforts to improve the ease of doing business in the country.

Tags : PARLIAMENT   LEGISLATION   BUDGET 2016   COMPANIES AMEMENDMENT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved