Chhattisgarh HC: Father Must Provide Maintenance and Marriage Expenses to Unmarried Adult Daughter  ||  Delhi HC Rules That ‘Hermès’ and the 3D Shape of its ‘Birkin’ Bag are Well-Known Trademarks in India  ||  Kerala HC: Arrest is Illegal if Accused isn’t Produced in 24 Hours and Rearrest From Prison is Barred  ||  Supreme Court: Treating Every Sour Relationship as Rape Undermines the Seriousness of the Offence  ||  Supreme Court: Section 7 IBC Application Cannot be Rejected for Curable Defects in Affidavit  ||  NCLT Kochi: Sec 7 Insolvency Cannot be Filed Against Guarantor Without First Enforcing the Guarantee  ||  Patna High Court: Mere Two-And-A-Half-Year Incarceration is Not Sufficient for Bail under UAPA  ||  Bombay HC: Insolvency Cannot be Used to Evade a Family Court’s Maintenance Order  ||  Kerala HC: Forklifts and Factory Cranes Are Motor Vehicles and Must be Registered under MV Act  ||  Guj HC: Edible Crude Palm Kernel Oil Qualifies for Duty Exemption; End-Use Condition not Applicable    

CESTAT, Ahmedabad: Extended Period of Limitation Not Invoked When No Suppression - (16 Mar 2022)

SERVICE TAX

Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Ahmedabad has ruled that the extended period of limitation was not invoked as there was no suppression or wilful misstatement on the part of the Adani Enterprise.

Tags : CUSTOMS   EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL   EXTENDED PERIOD OF LIMITATION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved