P&H HC: Eyewitness Account Not Credible if Eyewitness Directly Identifies Accused in Court  ||  Delhi HC: Conditions u/s 45 PMLA Have to Give Way to Article 21 When Accused Incarcerated for Long  ||  Delhi High Court: Delhi Police to Add Grounds of Arrest in Arrest Memo  ||  Kerala High Court: Giving Seniority on the Basis of Rules is a Policy Decision  ||  Del. HC: Where Arbitrator has Taken Plausible View, Court Cannot Interfere u/s 34 of A&C Act  ||  Ker. HC: No Question of Estoppel Against Party Where Error is Committed by Court Itself  ||  Supreme Court: Revenue Entries are Admissible as Evidence of Possession  ||  SC: Mere Breakup of Relationship Between Consenting Couple Can’t Result in Criminal Proceedings  ||  SC: Bar u/s 195 CrPC Not Attracted Where Proceedings Initiated Pursuant to Judicial Order  ||  NTF Gives Comprehensive Suggestions on Enhancing Better Working Conditions of Medical Professions    

NCLAT: Failure to Reply to Demand Notice Does Not Preclude Corporate Debtor from Raising Dispute - (15 Mar 2022)

INSOLVENCY

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal has held that the mere fact that the corporate debtor did not reply to the demand notice by the Operational Creditor under Section 8(1) within 10 days or that the corporate debtor did not file a reply to the demand notice does not preclude the corporate debtor from bringing on record evidence to establish a pre-existing dispute.

Tags : NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL   FAILURE TO REPLY TO DEMAND NOTICE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved