Allahabad HC: Employees of Constituent Institutions are not Entitled to Central University Benefits  ||  Calcutta High Court: Juvenile Accused Eligible to Apply for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 CrPC  ||  J&K & L HC: Departmental Proceedings Not Halted by Pending Criminal Case Without Showing Prejudice  ||  Cal HC: CESTAT Appeals Abate After Resolution Plan Success; CENVAT Reversal Requires No Pre-Deposit  ||  Bom HC: SEBI Settlement Doesn’t Protect Accused from Criminal Liability in Serious Economic Offences  ||  SC Directs States to Notify Eco-Sensitive Zones Around Tiger Reserves and Regulate Tiger Safaris  ||  SC: Its 2024 Order Letting Union Review Benami Act Cases Based on 'Ganpati Dealcom' was Incorrect  ||  SC: Rejection of Income Tax Settlement Application Doesn’t Bar Assessee from Contesting Assessment  ||  SC Informed Accessibility Facilities for Visually Impaired Candidates in AIBE and CLAT Expected Soon  ||  Supreme Court: Pendency of Writ Proceedings Does Not Bar Availing Alternative Statutory Remedies    

NCLAT: Failure to Reply to Demand Notice Does Not Preclude Corporate Debtor from Raising Dispute - (15 Mar 2022)

INSOLVENCY

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal has held that the mere fact that the corporate debtor did not reply to the demand notice by the Operational Creditor under Section 8(1) within 10 days or that the corporate debtor did not file a reply to the demand notice does not preclude the corporate debtor from bringing on record evidence to establish a pre-existing dispute.

Tags : NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL   FAILURE TO REPLY TO DEMAND NOTICE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved