Supreme Court: Appellate Courts Have Limited Power to Modify Arbitral Awards  ||  Supreme Court: ‘Digital Access’ a Part of Fundamental Right to Life  ||  NCLAT: Adjudica. Authority Can’t Ignore Sufficient Material to Show Dispute u/s 9(5)(ii)(d) of IBC  ||  Bombay HC: Order of Granting or Refusing Temporary Injunction is 'Discretionary'  ||  Bom HC: Can’t Treat Disclosure as Full if Material Suggests Loan is Nothing but Undisclosed Fund  ||  Delhi HC: Uploading SCN Under ‘Additional Notices’ Tab Not Proper  ||  Kar. HC: Central Government to Take Steps for Blocking 'Proton Mail' in India  ||  SC: CBI to Conduct Preliminary Enquiries in ‘Builder-Banks’ Nexus  ||  SC: Presiding Officers of Commercial Courts Should be Imparted Some Training  ||  SC: It is Constitutional to Fix Pecuniary Jurisdiction Based on Value of Consideration    

MP HC: Conducting Preliminary Enquiry Not Sine Qua Non for Direction for Prosecution - (07 Feb 2022)

CRIMINAL

Madhya Pradesh High Court has held that conducting a preliminary enquiry is not sine qua non for issuing a direction for prosecution under Section 195 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and that the Applicant is not entitled for any opportunity of hearing prior to that.

Tags : MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT   SINE QUA NON FOR DIRECTION FOR PROSECUTION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved