Rajasthan HC Directs State to Not Take Coercive Steps Against Meat Shop Owners  ||  Gujarat HC Grants Leave to Complainant under Section 12 Despite Completion of Inquiry  ||  Kerala HC: Can’t Liberally Construe Benefit of S. 14 Limitation Act Just to Save a Lis  ||  Delhi HC: Absence of Deceased’s Train Ticket Cannot Negate Legitimacy of Compensation Claim  ||  Supreme Court Outlines Essential Components of Valid Legal Notice  ||  Rajasthan HC: Arbitral Award Beyond Express Terms of Contract is Patently Illegal  ||  Delhi High Court Passes John Doe Order in Favour of Sadhguru  ||  SC: Law Does Not Require that a Fact Requires to be Proved on Absolute Terms Bereft of all Doubts  ||  SC Issues Notice on Plea Against NCLAT Mandating Committee of Creditors Nod for CIRP Withdrawal  ||  SC: Wife Remaining Unmarried after Divorce Entitled to Maintenance Reflecting her Standard of Life    

ICICI Bank Limited v. Unimers India Limited and Ors. - (High Court of Bombay) (07 Mar 2016)

DRT has no jurisdiction to hear un-appointed debenture trustee

MANU/MH/0219/2016

Banking

In a claim for recovery made by a debenture trustee of debentures of a company on behalf of or for the benefit of the debenture holders, the Debt Recovery Tribunal will have no jurisdiction to entertain an application for recovery. The Court distinguished the standing of a debenture trustee with that of a “secured creditor”: not falling within such a definition, a debenture trustee not appointed by a bank or financial institution would instead have legal recourse to civil courts.

Relevant : Krishna Filaments Ltd. vs. Industrial Development Bank of India and Ors. MANU/MH/0001/2004 Alpha and Omega Diagnostics India Ltd. vs. Asset Reconstruction Company (I) Ltd. and Ors. MANU/MH/0898/2010 Section 18 Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993

Section 2 SARFAESI Act, 2002

Tags : DEBENTURE TRUSTEE   TRIBUNAL   DEBT RECOVERY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved