Supreme Court: Uncrystallized Contractual Damages Not an Operational Debt under Section 9 IBC  ||  Supreme Court: Interest Accrued in Suspense Account After NPA Classification is Recoverable as Debt  ||  Supreme Court: S.69 GST Arrest Order with “Reasons to Believe” Must Precede Arrest  ||  Supreme Court: Winding-Up Proceedings Period Cannot be Excluded under Section 14 Limitation Act  ||  Supreme Court: Separate Appeals Unnecessary Against Common Judgment on Suit and Counterclaim  ||  Supreme Court: Unsuccessful Party Can Seek Post-Award Section 9 Relief in Exceptional Cases  ||  Delhi HC Rejects Black Money Act Challenge, Imposes Rs. 60,000 Costs over Prosecution Avoidance  ||  Delhi HC Affirms Teacher's POCSO Conviction, Urges Schools to Encourage Children to Speak Up  ||  Kerala HC: NGO Funding Peaceful Protests Can't Justify FCRA Renewal Denial  ||  Delhi HC: Courts Cannot Judge Sufficiency of Material For Issuing Look Out Circular    

Patna HC: Govt Counsel Cannot Defend Order Passed by Adjudicating Authority - (31 Jan 2022)

CIVIL

Patna High Court has held that when an order passed by the adjudicating authority is challenged before the Court, the same cannot be defended by the Govt counsel by relying on such material that was never placed before the authority, despite it being in existence at the time of adjudication.

Tags : PATNA HIGH COURT   ORDER PASSED BY ADJUDICATING AUTHORITY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved