P&H HC: Eyewitness Account Not Credible if Eyewitness Directly Identifies Accused in Court  ||  Delhi HC: Conditions u/s 45 PMLA Have to Give Way to Article 21 When Accused Incarcerated for Long  ||  Delhi High Court: Delhi Police to Add Grounds of Arrest in Arrest Memo  ||  Kerala High Court: Giving Seniority on the Basis of Rules is a Policy Decision  ||  Del. HC: Where Arbitrator has Taken Plausible View, Court Cannot Interfere u/s 34 of A&C Act  ||  Ker. HC: No Question of Estoppel Against Party Where Error is Committed by Court Itself  ||  Supreme Court: Revenue Entries are Admissible as Evidence of Possession  ||  SC: Mere Breakup of Relationship Between Consenting Couple Can’t Result in Criminal Proceedings  ||  SC: Bar u/s 195 CrPC Not Attracted Where Proceedings Initiated Pursuant to Judicial Order  ||  NTF Gives Comprehensive Suggestions on Enhancing Better Working Conditions of Medical Professions    

Patna HC: Govt Counsel Cannot Defend Order Passed by Adjudicating Authority - (31 Jan 2022)

CIVIL

Patna High Court has held that when an order passed by the adjudicating authority is challenged before the Court, the same cannot be defended by the Govt counsel by relying on such material that was never placed before the authority, despite it being in existence at the time of adjudication.

Tags : PATNA HIGH COURT   ORDER PASSED BY ADJUDICATING AUTHORITY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved