Madras HC: Repeated Remand Orders U/S 37 A&C Act are Unworkable Without Reversing Merits  ||  Delhi High Court: Unproven Immoral Conduct of a Parent Cannot Influence Child Custody Decisions  ||  Delhi High Court: Counsel Cannot Treat Passovers or Adjournments as an Automatic Right  ||  Delhi HC: Landlord’s Rent Control Act Rights Cannot be Waived by Contract With Tenant  ||  Bom HC: Arbitrator Who Halts Proceedings over Unpaid Revised Fees Effectively Withdraws From Office  ||  SC Holds That if Some Offences Are Quashed On Compromise, The FIR Cannot Continue For Others  ||  SC Holds That Prior Opportunity to See Accused Can Render Test Identification Proceeding Unreliable  ||  Allahabad HC: Employees of Constituent Institutions are not Entitled to Central University Benefits  ||  Calcutta High Court: Juvenile Accused Eligible to Apply for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 CrPC  ||  J&K & L HC: Departmental Proceedings Not Halted by Pending Criminal Case Without Showing Prejudice    

NCLAT: Superseded Director Not Entitled to Notice of CoC Meeting - (31 Jan 2022)

BANKING

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal has held that there exists a difference between supersession of Directors under the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 and suspension of Directors under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 and that a superseded director who vacated office on supersession of Board under the RBI Act is not entitled to the notice of Committee of Creditors meeting and has no right to participate in the meeting.

Tags : NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL   SUPERSEDED DIRECTOR  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved