NCLAT: Consideration of Debt Restructuring by Lenders Doesn’t Bar Member from Initiating Proceedings  ||  Delhi High Court: In Matters of Medical Evaluation, Courts Should Exercise Restraint  ||  Delhi HC: Any Person in India Has Right to Legally Import Goods from Abroad and Sell the Same  ||  Delhi HC: Waiver to Section 12(5) of Arbitration Act to be Given Once Tribunal is Constituted  ||  Supreme Court Has Asked States to Regularise Existing Court Managers  ||  SC: Union & States to Create Special POSCO Courts on Top Priority  ||  SC Upholds Authority of CERC to Award Compensation for Delays  ||  SC: Arbitral Tribunal Has Discretion to Include in Sum Awarded, Interest at Rate as it Deems Reasonab  ||  SC: Cannot Use Article 142 to Frame Guidelines on Judicial Recusal  ||  SC: Satisfaction Recorder in One EP Won’t Affect Subsequent EPs for Future Breaches    

Sudhir Kumar Jain vs . Ministry of Finance , Department of Financial Services - (Central Information Commission) (29 Feb 2016)

Notes on termination to not be withheld despite ongoing investigation

MANU/CI/0034/2016

Right to Information

The Commission noted that providing copies of file notings relating to suspension and termination of the Appellant would not affect the process of investigation by the CBI or prosecution of offenders. However, directing disclosure of such information, it reminded redacting third party information and names of officials who dealt with the case. The Appellant’s demand for information, directed to the Department of Financial Services, was predicated upon him being suspended and then dismissed as Chief Managing Director of Syndicate Bank. The CPIO refused handing over the information, it being marked ‘confidential’, and stating that disclosure of the same would “impair the very process of law enforcement in this as well as future cases.”

Relevant : Section 8 Right to Information Act, 2005

Tags : RTI   SUSPENSION   ONGOING INVESTIGATION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved