Bombay HC: Clarifies Procedure for Executing Foreign Decrees  ||  Supreme Court: Bureaucratic Delay No Excuse  ||  Supreme Court Grants Full Disability Pension Arrears to Veterans  ||  Delhi HC: Workman Cannot Claim Section 17(B) of the ID Act Wages after Reaching Superannuation Age  ||  Allahabad HC: Caste by Birth Remains Unchanged Despite Conversion or Inter-Caste Marriage  ||  Delhi High Court: Tweeting Corruption Allegations Against Employer Can Constitute Misconduct  ||  Delhi High Court: State Gratuity Authorities Lack Jurisdiction over Multi-State Establishments  ||  Kerala High Court: Arrest Grounds Need Not Mention Contraband Quantity When No Seizure is Made  ||  SC: Silence During Investigation Does Not Ipso Facto Mean Non-Cooperation to Deny Bail  ||  Supreme Court: High Courts Cannot Re-Examine Answer Keys Even in Judicial Service Exams    

Sudhir Kumar Jain vs . Ministry of Finance , Department of Financial Services - (Central Information Commission) (29 Feb 2016)

Notes on termination to not be withheld despite ongoing investigation

MANU/CI/0034/2016

Right to Information

The Commission noted that providing copies of file notings relating to suspension and termination of the Appellant would not affect the process of investigation by the CBI or prosecution of offenders. However, directing disclosure of such information, it reminded redacting third party information and names of officials who dealt with the case. The Appellant’s demand for information, directed to the Department of Financial Services, was predicated upon him being suspended and then dismissed as Chief Managing Director of Syndicate Bank. The CPIO refused handing over the information, it being marked ‘confidential’, and stating that disclosure of the same would “impair the very process of law enforcement in this as well as future cases.”

Relevant : Section 8 Right to Information Act, 2005

Tags : RTI   SUSPENSION   ONGOING INVESTIGATION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved