Bombay High Court: ‘GIRNAR’ a Well Known Trademark in India  ||  Kerala HC: Criminal Courts of District Judiciary Cannot Recall their Earlier Orders  ||  Madras HC: Only ‘Preponderance of Probability’ Required in Disciplinary Proceedings  ||  Raj HC: Non-Disclosure of Information Wasn’t a Ground for Disqualification Before 2015 Amendment Act  ||  Bom. HC: Workers in Statutory Canteens are Principal Employer’s Employees  ||  Supreme Court: NCLAT Cannot Use its ‘Inherent Powers’ to Subvert Legal Provisions  ||  Supreme Court: NCLAT Cannot Use its ‘Inherent Powers’ to Subvert Legal Provisions  ||  SC Refuses to Mark Presence of Advocate Who Did Not Argue the Matter  ||  SC Sets Aside HC’s Decision to Accept Aadhaar Card as a Proof of Date of Birth  ||  SC Permits Candidate with Blindness to Attend Interview for Selection of Civil Judges in Rajasthan    

Kerala HC: Substantial Distinction Between Consent and Submission to Sexual Intercourse - (19 Nov 2021)

CRIMINAL

Kerala High Court has held that there is a substantial distinction between consent and submission to sexual intercourse. The Court has observed that merely for the reason that the victim was in love with the accused, it cannot be presumed that she had given consent for sexual intercourse.

Tags : KERALA HIGH COURT   DISTINCTION BETWEEN CONSENT AND SUBMISSION TO SEXUAL INTERCOURSE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved