SC: Suit Alleging Coercion or Undue Influence Cannot be Rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC  ||  Cal HC: Once ED Attachment is Confirmed, Challenge Becomes Academic; PMLA Remedy Must be Pursued  ||  MP HC: Pen-Drive Evidence Cannot be Introduced At a Late Trial Stage Without Proof or Relevance  ||  Calcutta HC: Employee Can't be Stopped From Joining Rival Post-Resignation; Trade Secrets Protected  ||  Calcutta HC: Banks Must Provide Forensic Audit Report Before Calling an Account Fraudulent  ||  Del HC: Woman Cannot Demand Re-Entry to Abandoned Matrimonial Home if Alternate Accommodation Exists  ||  Calcutta HC: Land Acquisition For Industrial Park is Public Purpose; Leasing to Industry is Valid  ||  Patna HC: PwD Recruitment Must Comply With RPwD Act; Executive Resolutions Cannot Override the Law  ||  Madras HC: Individuals Facing Criminal Trial Must Get Court Permission Even to Renew Passports  ||  Calcutta HC: Demolition Orders Cannot be Challenged under Article 226 if a Statutory Appeal Exists    

Kerala HC: Substantial Distinction Between Consent and Submission to Sexual Intercourse - (19 Nov 2021)

CRIMINAL

Kerala High Court has held that there is a substantial distinction between consent and submission to sexual intercourse. The Court has observed that merely for the reason that the victim was in love with the accused, it cannot be presumed that she had given consent for sexual intercourse.

Tags : KERALA HIGH COURT   DISTINCTION BETWEEN CONSENT AND SUBMISSION TO SEXUAL INTERCOURSE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved