NCLAT: Can File Appeal against NCLT Order Initiating Insolvency Process against Personal Guarantors  ||  NCLAT: Assets Reflecting in Corporate Debtor’s Balance Sheet form Part of Liquidation Estate  ||  NCLAT: Adjudicating Authority Must Conduct Independent Assessment under IBC  ||  NCLAT: Can’t Preclude Financial Creditors from Filing Applic. in Case of Settlement Agreement Breach  ||  NCLT: Can’t Call Speculative Investment a 'Financial Debt' in Absence of Commercial Effect of Borrowi  ||  NCLAT: Committee of Creditors Within its Right to Resolve to Liquidate Go Airlines  ||  AP HC: Revealed Particulars of Invest. Not Adequately Substantiated Can Damage Reputation of Persons  ||  J&K HC: Administrative Officers Can’t Claim Seniority on Basis of Unfilled Vacancies  ||  Bombay High Court: One Needs to be Mindful of the Object Behind the Consumer Protection Act  ||  J&K HC: Can’t Put Accused under Prev. Detention Only because His Release Affects Public Confidence    

Kerala HC: Substantial Distinction Between Consent and Submission to Sexual Intercourse - (19 Nov 2021)

CRIMINAL

Kerala High Court has held that there is a substantial distinction between consent and submission to sexual intercourse. The Court has observed that merely for the reason that the victim was in love with the accused, it cannot be presumed that she had given consent for sexual intercourse.

Tags : KERALA HIGH COURT   DISTINCTION BETWEEN CONSENT AND SUBMISSION TO SEXUAL INTERCOURSE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved