All. HC: Arbitrator’s Requirement to Provide Reason Hinges on Pleadings & Available Docs. on Record  ||  Supreme Court: No Provision Under GST Act for Pre-payment Prior to Adjudication  ||  Supreme Court: Cannot Set Aside Conviction Only on the Ground that Witness Turned Hostile  ||  SC: Can Use Witness Statement Recorded In Absence of Accused, if Conditions of S. 299 CrPC Fulfilled  ||  Del. HC: Administration has Turned Blind Eye Towards Functioning of Dairies in National Capital  ||  Delhi High Court: Ramping Up of Food Sampling & Testing Required in National Capital  ||  Bom. HC: Ensure Availability of Essential Infrastructure to Implement e-Mulakaat System in Prisons  ||  Supreme Court: Concept of 'Parental Alienation Syndrome' Discussed in Child Custody Dispute  ||  Allahabad HC: Person Reposing Faith in Islam Cannot Claim Right in Nature of Live-in-Relationship  ||  Bom. HC: Renaming of Aurangabad and Osmanabad to Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar And Dharashiv Upheld    

SC Sets Aside Bombay HC’s Judgment Interpreting Touch as Skin-to- Skin Contact Under POCSO Act - (18 Nov 2021)

CRIMINAL

Supreme Court has set aside a judgment of the Bombay High Court that held that skin-to-skin contact was necessary for the offence of sexual assault under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012. The Court has said restricting the meaning of touch to skin-to-skin contact would lead to narrow and absurd interpretation and destroy the intent of the Act, which was enacted to protect children from sexual offences.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   SKIN-TO- SKIN CONTACT UNDER POCSO ACT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved